Example sentences of "leave of the court of [noun] " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 Appeal against any non-mandatory sentence requires the leave of the Court of Appeal ( Criminal Division ) , or of a single High Court judge acting on its behalf .
2 It is important that the grounds of appeal are full because any omission can only be cured with the leave of the Court of Appeal .
3 The question raised by the petition is whether an order made by the Court of Appeal of New Zealand on 4 October 1991 dismissing the petitioner 's action was a final order which entitled the petitioner to appeal as of right to Her Majesty in Council or whether the order was an interlocutory order against which there was no appeal save with the leave of the Court of Appeal or the grant of special leave by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council .
4 These were appeals by the applicants , Abdul Malik Choudhury and Nitya Ranjan Purkayastha , by leave of the Court of Appeal , from an order dated 6 November 1991 of that court ( Balcombe , Taylor and McCowan L.JJ. ) ( 1991 ) 90 L.G.R. 103 , allowing appeals by the respondents , The Bishop Challoner Roman Catholic Comprehensive Girls ' School ( ‘ the school ’ ) and the appeal committee of the school , against orders dated 31 July 1991 of Simon Brown J.
5 APPEAL ( No. 10 of 1992 ) with leave of the Court of Appeal of Hong Kong , and with special leave , by the applicant , George Tan Soon Gin , from the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Hong Kong ( Yang C.J. , Silke V.-P. and Bewley J. ) given on 29 November 1991 , whereby they held that they had no jurisdiction to hear the applicant 's appeal from the judgment of Barnett J. delivered on 13 May 1991 in the High Court [ 1991 ] 2 H.K.L.R. 400 refusing the applicant 's application for judicial review of the decision of the first respondent , Judge Cameron , in the district court dated 4 December 1990 , refusing to stay the criminal proceedings by the second respondent , the Attorney-General of Hong Kong , against the applicant in the district court relating to West L.B. ( Asia ) Ltd. and Barclays ( Asia ) Ltd .
6 In circumstances which must be explained at a later stage the appeal is before the Board both by leave of the Court of Appeal in Hong Kong and by special leave granted by the Board itself .
7 This was an appeal , by leave of the Court of Appeal , by the plaintiffs , A. T. & T. Istel Ltd. and Abbey Business Consultants Ltd. , from an order dated 12 November 1991 of that court ( Lord Donaldson of Lymington M.R. , Neill and Butler-Sloss L.JJ. ) [ 1992 ] 1 Q.B .
8 This was an appeal by the Inland Revenue Commissioners , by leave of the Court of Appeal , from the order of the Court of Appeal ( Glidewell and Butler-Sloss L.JJ. , Ralph Gibson L.J .
9 APPEAL ( No. 28 of 1991 ) with leave of the Court of Appeal of Hong Kong by the Commissioner of Inland Revenue from the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Hong Kong ( Cons Ag .
10 APPEAL ( No. 6 of 1991 ) with leave of the Court of Appeal of Bermuda by the plaintiff , Horace Brenton Kelly , from the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Bermuda ( Blair-Kerr P. , Roberts and Henry JJ.A. ) given on 30 November 1989 allowing an appeal by the defendants , Margot Cooper and Helen Cooper ( trading as Cooper Associates , a firm ) from the judgment of Hull J. delivered on 14 November 1988 in the Supreme Court of Bermuda ( Civil Jurisdiction ) , whereby he awarded the plaintiff $200,000 damages for breach of contract and made a declaration that the defendants were not entitled to commission on the sale of the plaintiff 's property , and the defendants ' counterclaim for commission was dismissed .
11 This was an appeal by the Crown by leave of the Court of Appeal ( Criminal Division ) ( Lord Lane C.J. , Hutchison and Mantell JJ. ) from its decision on 22 April 1991 allowing an appeal by the defendant , Edwin Gomez , against his conviction at Isleworth Crown Court ( Mr. Recorder Bassingthwaighte ) on two counts of theft , the defendant having on 20 April 1990 pleaded guilty on re-arraignment to one count and on 24 April 1990 been found guilty by verdict of a jury on a further count .
12 My Lords , this is an appeal brought by the Director of Public Prosecutions with the leave of the Court of Appeal ( Criminal Division ) [ 1991 ] 1 W.L.R. 1334 from a decision of that court on 22 April 1991 allowing the appeal of the respondent defendant , Edwin Gomez , against his convictions on 20 and 24 April 1990 at Isleworth Crown Court on two counts of theft , for which he received concurrent sentences of two years ' imprisonment , and quashing those convictions .
13 These were an appeal by the applicant , Edgar Page , and cross-appeals by the University of Hull and the Lord President of the Privy Council acting for the visitor of the university by leave of the Court of Appeal ( Lord Donaldson of Lymington M.R. , Staughton and Farquharson L.JJ. ) [ 1991 ] 1 W.L.R. 1277 from its decision of 31 July 1991 allowing an appeal by the university and the Lord President from the Divisional Court of the Queen 's Bench Division .
  Next page