Example sentences of "it must be shown that " in BNC.
Next page| No | Sentence |
|---|---|
| 1 | It must be shown that the defendant intended ( which , again , includes both purpose and awareness of practical certainty ) to cause really serious injury to someone . |
| 2 | Second , it must be shown that there was no expression of view made by the person as to what should be done in the event that he became incompetent , or , if there were such an expression of view , that it was made when the patient was already incompetent . |
| 3 | In order to prove this intent it must be shown that the accused meant to treat the property as his own . |
| 4 | Furthermore if the idea of a first and second wave is to be sustained , then — in Clarke 's , Hall 's and others ' formulations — it must be shown that one wave in some senses follows the other . |
| 5 | In order to obtain a conviction , it must be shown that the accused intends to use violence or is aware that his conduct may be violent . |
| 6 | Under the new law , liability is further particularised by the expression in question , so that it must be shown that the conduct was used towards another . |
| 7 | For the second , it must be shown that it is likely that violence will be provoked . |
| 8 | So far as the attitude to his obstruction is concerned , the essence is that it must be shown that the defendant has deliberately brought about the state of affairs that makes it more difficult for the police to do their duties , and is aware that he has done so . |
| 9 | It must be shown that the plaintiff acted voluntarily in the sense that he could exercise a free choice . |
| 10 | Before this defence has any role to play it must be shown that the defendant has committed a tort . |
| 11 | It is not sufficient that someone had an opportunity to examine the goods , it must be shown that the manufacturer could reasonably expect that person to make an examination . |
| 12 | Notice to produce the document must have been given in order to render oral evidence of it admissible ; it must be shown that the document existed , is or was in the possession of the other side , and that the original would have been admissible and relevant . |
| 13 | However , in order to maintain this defence , it must be shown that the publisher exercised " all reasonable care in relation to the publication " — which means that the publisher took steps to avoid obvious confusion , ensured that sources were checked and that familiar reference works were consulted . |