Example sentences of "just [coord] equitable " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 Finally , the 1987 Act provides that where a minor has acquired property under a contract which is unenforceable against him , or which he has repudiated on the grounds of minority , he may be required by the court , when it thinks it ‘ just and equitable ’ to do so , to return the property , or else property representing that which he has acquired ( without prejudice to any other remedy available to the plaintiff ) .
2 May we not waste our lives in jealousy and greed , but play our part in working towards a more just and equitable future where resources can be divided equally between all the peoples of the world .
3 your conduct was such that it would be just and equitable to make a deduction ;
4 it was just and equitable to make a deduction because you unreasonably refused an offer of reinstatement ;
5 The award will be the amount that the tribunal considers just and equitable in all the circumstances .
6 If a tribunal decides that , although your dismissal was unfair , you were partly to blame , it will reduce your compensation by the amount it considers just and equitable .
7 The time limit can be extended by a further six months if it appears to be ‘ just and equitable ’ to do so .
8 To rely upon the 1982 accounts as providing a reason for deciding to discount these bills would have been reckless ; it would have been just and equitable to require Union Discount to bear the whole of the loss . ’
9 It was just and equitable to order a sale because otherwise unfairness and injustice would result .
10 All the elements of a quasi-partnership were present and since there had been a loss of mutual confidence , on the basis of Ebrahimi v Westbourne Galleries Ltd [ 1973 ] AC 360 , it was just and equitable that the company should be wound up .
11 the court is of the opinion that it is just and equitable that the company should be wound up .
12 Section 5 of the Business Names Act 1985 provides that where a person fails to comply with the requirement set out in s. 5 and thereafter seeks to enforce a business contract with a party in default by means of a court action , ( a ) if the person in default can establish that he or she has a claim against the proprietor , which due to the proprietor 's failure to comply with s. 5 he or she has been unable to pursue , or ( b ) if a breach by the proprietor of s. 5 has caused the person in default some financial loss , the proprietor 's claim shall be dismissed , unless it is ‘ just and equitable ’ that the proprietor should be allowed to continue the action .
13 whenever the court is of the opinion that in the circumstances it would be just and equitable to dissolve the partnership .
14 the court is of the opinion that it is just and equitable that the company should be wound up .
15 Where any person suffers damage as the result partly of his own fault and partly of the fault of any other person or persons , a claim in respect of damage shall not be defeated by reason of the fault of the person suffering the damage , but the damages recoverable in respect thereof shall be reduced to such an extent as the court thinks just and equitable having regard to the claimant 's share in the responsibility for the damage …
16 ( 4 ) An order under this section in respect of any costs may only be made if — ( a ) an order for costs would be made in the proceedings apart from this Act ; ( b ) as respects the costs incurred in a court of first instance , those proceedings were instituted by the assisted party and the court is satisfied that the unassisted party will suffer severe financial hardship unless the order is made ; and ( c ) in any case , the court is satisfied that it is just and equitable in all the circumstances of the case that provision for the costs should be made out of public funds .
17 It is common ground that in a majority of cases where an order may be made under section 18 for the payment by the Board to the unassisted party of the costs of appellate , as opposed to first instance , proceedings , the Court of Appeal or this House will be in a position at the conclusion of an appeal on the information then before it to decide under section 18(3) what , if any , order for costs should be made against the assisted party and to form at least a provisional view under section 18(4) ( c ) as to whether it would be ‘ just and equitable in all the circumstances of the case that provision for the costs should be made out of public funds . ’
18 ( 3 ) That , although the court had a discretion to order rectification of the register on the grounds set out in section 82(1) ( a ) to ( h ) of the Land Registration Act 1925 , the section did not contain a general power allowing the court to order rectification of the register in any case in which it thought it just and equitable to do so ; and that , since the defendant no longer alleged fraud and his claim of non est factum had failed , the defendant 's claim did not come within section 82(1) and , therefore , the court had no discretion under the section to order rectification of the register of charges ( post , pp. 683B–C , 685E–F , 688E–F , 689C–D ) .
19 ‘ 2(1) Subject to subsection ( 3 ) below , in any proceedings for contribution under section 1 above the amount of the contribution recoverable from any person shall be such as may be found by the court to be just and equitable having regard to the extent of that person 's responsibility for the damage in question .
20 In so far as the plaintiffs are seeking to recover from the third defendant money which he has obtained for his own benefit or for the benefit of companies which are , in effect , his alter ego , I can see that the third party would have an overwhelming argument that it can not be just and equitable to require him to contribute to whatever the third defendant is ordered to pay to the plaintiffs .
21 I can see that the third party would have a cogent argument that even if he were liable to compensate the plaintiffs in respect of these matters it would not be just and equitable to require him to make a contribution to the third defendant 's liability .
22 it is just and equitable that provision for those costs should be made out of public funds ;
23 In all cases , whether in courts of first instance or not , an award of costs must be ‘ just and equitable . ’
24 Section 3 of the Minors ' Contracts Act 1987 empowers the court , where it would be ‘ just and equitable ’ ( i.e. fair ) to do so , to require the minor to return property which he has acquired under a contract which is unenforceable against him .
25 Under the Act it is possible for the purchaser to seek a court order against the vendors and the amount recoverable from any person shall be such as the court holds is just and equitable .
26 Section 1(1) provides : Where any person suffers damage as the result partly of his own fault and partly of the fault of any other person or persons , a claim in respect of that damage shall not be defeated by reason of the fault of the person suffering the damage , but the damages recoverable in respect thereof shall be reduced to such an extent as the court thinks just and equitable having regard to the claimant 's share in the responsibility for the damage .
27 The Law Reform ( Contributory Negligence ) Act , s. 1(1) directs the court to reduce the plaintiff 's damages to the extent that the court thinks just and equitable having regard to the claimant 's share in the responsibility for the damage .
28 The requirement that the reduction should be just and equitable means that there is no single test for determining the level of reduction of damages .
29 In the absence of an express agreement , under the Civil Liability ( Contribution ) Act 1978 the court will apportion the contributions between the vendors in such a manner as it considers to be just and equitable .
30 Ultimately a tribunal will award what they consider to be just and equitable on the facts of each case .
  Next page