Example sentences of "[coord] it [be] held that " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 It was found that the matter was viewed as ‘ civil ’ in Norwegian law , and it was held that ( contrary to the view of Woolf L.J. ) there was nothing to take fiscal matters outside the civil category in English law , which embraced everything which was not a criminal matter .
2 Unfortunately , the prosecution failed to disclose that the complainant had a spent conviction for theft , and it was held that , had the conviction been duly disclosed , the defence would have applied for and would undoubtedly have been granted leave to cross-examine the complainant about it .
3 Jones ( Note ) [ 1957 ] 1 W.L.R. 1118 , also cited by Kerr L.J. , a granddaughter was allowed to occupy one room in the house of her grandmother and it was held that the granddaughter was entitled to succeed to the tenancy of the whole house .
4 Rigge v. Bell ( 1793 ) 5 Durn. & E. 471 a parol agreement for a seven-year lease did not comply with the Statute of Frauds 1677 but the tenant entered and paid a yearly rent and it was held that he was tenant from year to year on the terms of the agreement .
5 The landlord gave six months ' notice and it was held that the notice was good .
6 So , too , in Ponting v. Noakes , the plaintiff 's horse reached over the defendant 's boundary , nibbled some poisonous tree there and died accordingly , and it was held that the plaintiff could recover nothing , for the damage was due to the horse 's own intrusion and , alternatively , there had been no escape of the vegetation .
7 where the defendants had taken every precaution that science could suggest to prevent injury of this sort , and it was held that as Parliament had authorised the use of locomotives it was consistent with policy and justice that the defendants , in the absence of any negligence , should not be liable .
8 13 , the definition of sale by retail was considered and it was held that the sale was defined by reference to quantity sold , not to the person to whom that quantity was sold .
9 The goods were damaged in transit and it was held that the seller was in breach of his duty under section 32(2) and the buyer was entitled to reject the goods .
10 On the other hand in Dodd v Wilson & McWilliam [ 1946 ] 2 All ER 691 , the plaintiff contracted with a veterinary surgeon to inoculate his cattle with a serum and it was held that the surgeon impliedly warranted the vaccine to be fit for the purpose for which it was supplied .
11 Thus in Priest v Last [ 1903 ] 2 KB 148 , a hot water bottle burst causing injury to the purchaser 's wife and it was held that there was a breach of the implied condition even though nothing was said about the purpose .
12 Thus in Cammell Laird and Co Ltd v Manganese Bronze and Brass Co Ltd [ 1934 ] AC 402 , the contract was for the provision of two propellers for a specified ship and it was held that the sellers knew the purpose for which the propellers were required , ie that they should be suitable for the ship in question .
13 In Teheran-Europe Co Ltd v Belton ( SDT ) Ltd [ 1969 ] 2 QB 545 , the facts involved the sale of machinery to a Persian company and it was held that there was no reliance on the seller 's skill or judgment since the seller was ignorant of the foreign market where the goods were destined for resale .
14 In this case the person concerned was a pacifist , and pacifism as a philosophy fell within the ambit of freedom of thought and conscience protected by Article 9 , but it was held that the protester was not manifesting her belief in the sense of Article 9 ( Report of the Commission of 12 October 1978 , Application No. 7050/75 ) .
15 Some consideration was given to whether the defect in Form N79 could be cured by this court under section 13 of the Act of 1960 or under R.S.C. , Ord. 59 , r. 10(3) , but it was held that this could not be done .
16 In Tameside the minister had sound administrative reasons for believing that the local authority was acting unreasonably but it was held that merely to have such reasons was insufficient .
17 The United Kingdom introduced legislation requiring the fitting of a ‘ dim-dip ’ device , invoking safety grounds , but it was held that the EEC directives on motor vehicle headlights regulated the matter in an exhaustive manner , so that a Member State could not require a form of lighting which was not listed in those directives .
18 In Interfoto Picture Library Ltd v Stiletto Visual Programmes Ltd [ 1988 ] 1 All ER 348 the initial contact between the parties was by telephone , but it was held that there was no concluded contract at that stage ( see also Saphir v Zissimos [ 1960 ] 1 Lloyd 's Rep 490 ) .
19 The Court of Appeal reversed this decision , but it was held that instructions were relevant in deciding fitness for purpose .
  Next page