Example sentences of "be subject to judicial " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 The Panel may , nevertheless , have to be supervised by the regulatory authority ( for example , the DTI ) and this would be subject to judicial review .
2 Although many governmental bodies owe their existence and powers to statute , it is clear that non-statutory governmental bodies may also be subject to judicial review .
3 On the same basis , non-governmental ( or ‘ private ’ ) bodies which perform public functions may be subject to judicial review .
4 But a body may be subject to judicial review even if the powers it exercises have no identifiable legal source ; so , for example , a refusal by a non-governmental , non-statutory licensing body , such as a horse-racing or boxing control body , to grant a licence to an applicant may be subject to judicial review even though it seems to be the case that before a licence is granted , no contract exists between the applicant and the licensing body .
5 But a body may be subject to judicial review even if the powers it exercises have no identifiable legal source ; so , for example , a refusal by a non-governmental , non-statutory licensing body , such as a horse-racing or boxing control body , to grant a licence to an applicant may be subject to judicial review even though it seems to be the case that before a licence is granted , no contract exists between the applicant and the licensing body .
6 To the extent that non-governmental bodies perform functions which government would have to perform if they did not , there is no good reason why such bodies should not be subject to judicial review in the same way as a government body performing equivalent functions would be .
7 We have seen that decisions and acts may be subject to judicial review if they are made or done in the exercise of public functions , whether those functions are conferred by statute or common law or neither .
8 Not only may judicial and administrative functions be subject to judicial review , but so also may legislative ( or ‘ rule-making ’ ) functions .
9 But rule-making by bodies other than Parliament may be subject to judicial review on a number of grounds , as we will see in due course .
10 Nevertheless , the courts have recognized the value of informal rules in a variety of contexts , and it is now quite clear that such rules may be subject to judicial review on a number of grounds ( as we will see in due course ) .
11 Such rules , too , may be subject to judicial review even if both the rules themselves and the body making them ‘ lack any visible means of legal support ’ .
12 As we have already seen , the exercise of de facto power may be subject to judicial review .
13 The administration of non-statutory , ex gratia compensation schemes may be subject to judicial review .
14 I do not accept the intervener 's argument that it is in some way undignified for the decision of a visitor on the basis of advice from an eminent judge to be subject to judicial review and that if certiorari is held to be available senior judges will not wish to give such advice .
15 It may also continue with disciplinary proceedings and such a decision , if taken bona fide , will not be subject to judicial review ( see R v Panel on Takeovers and Mergers , ex parte Fayed ( 1992 ) Financial Times , 14 April ) .
16 While the Panel does not fall squarely within this category of body , its activities are considered by the courts to be sufficiently similar so as to be subject to judicial review .
  Next page