Example sentences of "hold that there had been " in BNC.
Next page| No | Sentence |
|---|---|
| 1 | On appeal it was held that there had been no material irregularity in the proceedings . |
| 2 | It was held that there had been no breach of the condition as to title because that condition related to the time of the sale . |
| 3 | It was held that there had been no negligence , but on grounds of public policy the court would not award compensation where the plaintiff would have had to have broken the law . |
| 4 | It was held that there had been a breach of the implied condition as to fitness for purpose , the court refusing to read the word " particular " in s14(3) in the sense of special as opposed to general purpose . |
| 5 | The Court of Appeal held that there had been a dismissal . |
| 6 | In McGregor v Adcock 51 TC 692 , decided in 1977 , a 70 year old farmer sold five of his 35 acres for development , and the Court held that there had been a sale of assets of the business and not part of the business , thus denying retirement relief . |
| 7 | PETITION by the petitioner , Strathmore Group Ltd. , for special leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal of New Zealand ( Richardson , Hardie Boys and Gault JJ. ) given on 4 October 1991 allowing an appeal by the respondents , A. M. Fraser , C. Y. Todd and Durafort Investments Ltd. , from the judgment of Robertson J. in the High Court of New Zealand on 9 November 1990 , whereby he held that there had been no compromise which concluded all existing and future litigation between the parties ; and , as far as necessary , from the judgment of the Court of Appeal ( Cooke P. , Richardson and Hardie Boys JJ. ) given on 4 November 1991 dismissing the petitioner 's application for leave to appeal to the Privy Council . |
| 8 | The Court of Appeal , on his appeal against his conviction for theft upon one count covering all three consignments , on the ground that the count was bad for duplicity in that there were three separate appropriations , held that there had been no appropriation until the last of the goods were loaded , or probably until the defendant deviated from the route to the proper destination . |
| 9 | In this case , the Court of Appeal held that there had been a breach of s14(2) as the plaintiff had thought he was buying a second-hand enthusiast 's car in good condition at a fair price when in fact he was buying , at the same price , a car which no one , knowing its history ( a car insurance write-off because it had been submerged in water for over 24 hours ) , would have bought at other than at a substantially reduced price . |