Example sentences of "[adj] of [art] sale of [noun pl] " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 It is impossible for the seller to exempt himself from liability under section 12 of the Sale of Goods Act .
2 ( The purchaser could , of course , have brought an action against the vendor under section 12 of the Sale of Goods Act . )
3 Section 22 of the Sale of Goods Act provides :
4 It is agreed that in the case of goods we may exercise the aforesaid rights of rejection notwithstanding any provision contained in s 11 or 35 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 .
5 SECTION 57 OF THE SALE OF GOODS ACT
6 Indeed , as we saw in Chapter 3 , sections 17 and 18 of the Sale of Goods Act expressly recognise that property passes to the buyer at the time the parties intend it to .
7 Section 6(2) of the UCTA prevents exclusion of liability for breach of the warranties relating to conformance to description , conformance to sample , merchantable quality , and fitness for purpose which are implied by ss 13 , 14 and 15 of SGA , for sale of goods contracts , and ss 9 , 10 and 11 of the Sale of Goods ( Implied Terms ) Act 1973 , for hire purchase contracts .
8 Section 6 ( 3 ) of UCTA prevents exclusion or restriction of liability for breach of the warranties relating to conformance to description , conformance to sample , merchantable quality , and fitness for purpose which are implied by ss 13 , 14 and 15 of SGA , for sale of goods , and ss 9 , 10 and 11 of the Sale of Goods ( Implied Terms ) Act 1973 , for hire purchase contracts , unless such exclusion or restriction passes the test of reasonableness .
9 The provisions of section 25 of the Sale of Goods Act and section 9 of the Factors Act have already been considered ( see paragraph 5–32 above ) .
10 Also note that , since Lee v. Butler , sections 9 of the Factors Act and 25 of the Sale of Goods Act have been amended .
11 The most likely exception is that contained in two almost –33 identical statutory provisions , section 25 of the Sale of Goods Act and section 9 of the Factors Act 1889 .
12 Therefore if the hirer sells the goods , section 25 of the Sale of Goods Act and section 9 of the Factors Act will not operate to give his purchaser a good title .
13 A buyer under a conditional sale agreement which is a consumer credit agreement within the meaning of that Act ( see Chapter 19 ) , is for the purposes of section 25 of the Sale of Goods Act and section 9 of the Factors Act , not someone who has ‘ bought or agreed to buy , ’ ( Consumer Credit Act 1974 , Schedule 4 and section 25(2) of the Sale of Goods Act ) .
14 It was held that Cahn acquired good title to the goods by the operation of section 25 of the Sale of Goods Act .
15 It is , however , implicit in the closing words of both section 9 of the Factors Act and section 25 of the Sale of Goods Act .
16 We have seen that section 25 of the Sale of Goods Act and section 9 of the Factors Act typically apply where a seller lets his buyer take possession but retains property ( title to the goods ) until the buyer pays the price .
17 We have just seen that a hirer under a hire purchase agreement is not someone who has ‘ bought or agreed to buy ’ for the purpose of section 25 of the Sale of Goods Act .
18 By section 6 , the position is the same if he tries to exempt himself from section 13–15 of the Sale of Goods Act .
19 All of this does not , however , mean that if the goods prove defective the private seller can easily be made liable for breach of the terms of sections 13–15 of the Sale of Goods Act .
20 Section 6 , however , does not render a clause void unless the clause , properly interpreted , purports to exclude or limit liability under sections 13–15 of the Sale of Goods Act .
21 In the absence of a contrary statement in the contract between X and Y Ltd. , property will normally have passed by virtue of sections 16–18 of the Sale of Goods Act ( paragraphs 3–07 to 3–24 ) .
22 The implied terms in sections 12–15 of the Sale of Goods Act are often seen , and correctly so , as important safeguards for the consumer .
23 The 1973 Act was confined to exemption clauses which claimed to exclude or restrict the statutory implied terms relating to title , description , quality and sample ( implied by sections 12–15 of the Sale of Goods Act ) .
24 Exemption from sections 12–15 of the Sale of Goods Act — section 6
25 Section 6 of the Unfair Contract Terms Act applies to any clause claiming to exempt the seller from any of the terms implied by sections 12–15 of the Sale of Goods Act , i.e. the terms as to title description , merchantable quality , fitness for purpose and sample .
26 In any case where the buyer ‘ deals as consumer ’ it is impossible for the seller to exempt himself from any of his liability under sections 12–15 of the Sale of Goods Act .
27 We have just considered the extent to which the Unfair Contract Terms Act allows the seller to exclude his liability under section 12–15 of the Sale of Goods Act .
28 Section 8 of the Unfair Contract Terms Act is relevant to a claim for misrepresentation ; section 2 to a claim for negligence ; section 6 to a claim under sections 12–15 of the Sale of Goods Act ; section 3 to a claim for any other breach of contract .
29 Reference was made in Chapters 7 and 10 to the very important terms as to title , description , quality and sample which are implied by sections 12–15 of the Sale of Goods Act .
30 With the terms implied by sections 12–15 of the Sale of Goods Act it is easy because the Act makes it clear .
  Next page