Example sentences of "[be] [adj] to [art] question " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 Third , both these principles are subject to the question of whether the new condition may be cured or palliated .
2 This may be analogous to the question why a newly independent State is deemed bound by a treaty which brought it into existence .
3 That is , any information after the decision point must be irrelevant to the question which is the best path leading up to the decision point .
4 This may well extend our understanding of alliances on the larger scale ( Huggett forthcoming ) although we should be wary of assuming that the sources of the material are relevant to the question of alliances with all of England .
5 If circumstances such as time and place are relevant to the question whether the conduct is disorderly in the first place , what sorts of factors should the court ( or the policeman on the spot ) take into account in deciding whether or not the conduct was ‘ reasonable ’ ?
6 Thus s7(4) permits the court to take into account any statement in a welfare report or evidence given in respect of matters referred to in the report provided they are relevant to the question in hand .
7 This , of course , is subject to the question of whether the producer should have recalled the furniture if the risk was great , or issued warnings to retailers to pass on to consumers .
8 Use your lecture notes to help you identify what 's essential and what 's marginal to the question posed .
9 The Library Association 's Guidance notes on the Code of Professional Conduct contain much that is pertinent to the question of censorship and access of information , as one might expect .
10 But this is irrelevant to the question whether it is in relation to the grant of a further advance .
11 On the one hand , the examiner wants to be told nothing that is irrelevant to the question .
12 I repeat that the question on the Order Paper tonight is irrelevant to the question before the House and the country .
13 They were entitled in my judgment to take into account the actual use by the defendant company and the previous owner in determining what the ordinary use of that vehicle was on the road so far as it is relevant to the question they had to answer .
14 Educational practices can retard changes , or stigmatise them ( this is relevant to the question of generic he , which is often still insisted on by teachers ) ; publishing and the mass media can popularise a word , or conversely , fail to legitimate it ( quality newspapers , most famously the New York Times , for years refused to print the word Ms , even if the woman being written about preferred it ) .
15 This is relevant to the question raised in Section 19.1 as to whether the demarcation between non-turbulent and turbulent motion is sharp , or whether there is a ‘ grey area ’ .
16 A whole chapter of that committee 's report is devoted to the question of the requirements concerning data collection by the police force and the security services and the necessary controls .
17 The Privy Council reversed the decision , stating that provided fire damage was foreseeable as a kind of damage , the degree of likelihood was irrelevant to the question of kind of damage suffered .
18 By a notice of appeal dated 23 April 1992 the Treasury Solicitor appealed on the grounds that ( 1 ) on a true construction of the Evidence ( Proceedings in Other Jurisdictions ) Act 1975 the court was precluded from making the order for examination ; ( 2 ) the deputy judge had erred in law in making the order and in holding that ( i ) it was possible to interpret section 9(4) of the Act so as not to preclude the order sought , ( ii ) the exclusion contained in section 9(4) was restricted to cases where the actual capacity in which the witness was called on to give evidence was a Crown capacity and that the fact that the evidence sought was acquired in the course of the witness 's employment as a servant of the Crown was not of itself sufficient to bring the case within the exclusion , ( iii ) the fact that the witness was now retired from his position was relevant to the question whether the exclusion in section 9(4) applied , ( iv ) if some other interpretation were possible , it would be unacceptable to approach section 9(4) as requiring the court to refuse to make the order that a witness who was competent and compellable within the United Kingdom should give evidence for foreign proceedings , ( v ) there was nothing in the material sought to be given in evidence which it could have been the policy or intention of the Act to have prevented being explored ; ( 3 ) the deputy judge had erred in law in approaching the question of capacity by concentrating on the position of the witness at the time that the evidence was to be given as opposed to the position of the witness at the time that he acquired the information which was the subject matter of the evidence and the nature content and source of such evidence ; ( 4 ) the judge had wrongly ignored the fact that the Crown as a party to the Hague Convention was in a position to give effect to it and to provide evidence to foreign courts in accordance with it without recourse to the court ; and ( 5 ) the judge had wrongly approached section 9(4) on the footing that it most likely addressed prejudice to the sovereignty of the state .
19 Chapter 5 was devoted to the question of who then owns the goods , the purchaser or the original owner .
  Next page