Example sentences of "is submitted that the [noun] " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 On the basis of this , it is submitted that the question of subsidiarity is essentially a political question for the Council , and if the Council decided to act at the Community level it would not be possible to challenge what it did simply on the basis that it could better have been done at the level of the Member States ; rather , it would be necessary to show a manifest error , a misuse of power or a clear passing of the limits of discretion , and it is submitted that the occasions when this might be done will be rare .
2 It is submitted that the legislation in Hungary performs the role of midwife in the throes of the emergence of commerce , markets , and business with a commendable degree of success .
3 It is submitted that the offence is made out in such circumstances , and that a policeman would be justified in calling upon the ‘ joker to desist ( under subsection 4 ) .
4 However , it is submitted that the court should look at that practice rather than the civil practice in relation to the admission of fresh evidence .
5 It is submitted that the issue is really one of intention and causation .
6 It is submitted that the views of Browne LJ in Littlewoods case are to be preferred and that the approach of the majority is an extreme example of the object and intent approach which should not be followed .
7 It is submitted that the approach of the industrial tribunal in Fowler v Cammell Laird Ltd is preferable .
8 As was pointed out earlier , there is some uncertainty as to what constitutes a security interest ; it is submitted that the courts will adopt something along the lines of the definition of Sir Nicolas Browne-Wilkinson V.-C. set out at the commencement of this chapter .
9 In each case it is submitted that the sentences have to be quashed because there was unreasonable delay in giving the appellant a copy of the committal order , which in each case contained particulars of the facts found as constituting a contempt of court .
10 It is submitted that the whole of Skelton Village should be looked at as a unity , that there is extreme environmental value over its north part , and that were the village inset into the greenbelt , the inset boundary should be precisely as shown in the deposit copy of Southern Ryedale 's Local Plan .
11 Indeed , it is submitted that the reasoning in Schroeder 's case was based on public policy and Lord Diplock explained what was meant by public policy .
12 It is submitted that the hearing officer correctly interpreted the policy underlying section 40(1) .
13 It is submitted that the judgment can not be supported on principle , though , as regards the particular application of the principle , but no further , it must be taken to be law in any court of first instance .
14 For the plaintiffs it is submitted that the action of the employee valuer in exercising his professional skill and judgment in providing a basic valuation for consideration by the assessor is not action taken by the society but a service rendered to the society by a professional man as such , even though he is also an employee .
15 It is submitted that the fact that the participants consent to the use of violence against one another does not make their conduct lawful .
16 All in all , it is submitted that the claim that there is a risk of liability under section 2 of the Suicide Act does not serve as a valid justification for ignoring the request of the patient that treatment be discontinued .
17 On the basis of this , it is submitted that the question of subsidiarity is essentially a political question for the Council , and if the Council decided to act at the Community level it would not be possible to challenge what it did simply on the basis that it could better have been done at the level of the Member States ; rather , it would be necessary to show a manifest error , a misuse of power or a clear passing of the limits of discretion , and it is submitted that the occasions when this might be done will be rare .
18 Reference is made to Circular 14/85 — paragraphs 3.4 and 3.5 It is submitted that the appeal proposal would not cause any demonstrable harm to interests of acknowledged importance , therefore the general presumption in favour of development should prevail in this instance .
  Next page