Example sentences of "the court [modal v] [verb] " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 In both types of case , the minister 's words are considered and taken into account by the court : in both , the use of such words by the courts might affect what is said in Parliament .
2 The reference to ‘ all the circumstances ’ was not included in the Bill , but had been in earlier legislation , and was reinstated for fear that the courts might read into the omission a legislative intention that was not truly held .
3 More information was to be obtained on offenders , and their backgrounds , in order that the courts might select methods of disposal ‘ most likely to achieve the ends of justice in relation to the individual offender ’ .
4 There are three rules of construction which the courts might employ when construing a statute .
5 It would seem sensible , therefore , that given the current limitations of s.62 the courts ought to adopt a liberal interpretation of ‘ adversely affected ’ .
6 Caution against dealings provides that a third party claiming an interest such as the courts would enforce , shall be notified of any proposed dealing with the land so that he or she might challenge it .
7 There was no clear theory of jurisdiction and it was impossible to draw up a set of rules which could be used to predict when the courts would intervene .
8 If the courts were to develop the idea that all errors of law are jurisdictional , defined the word law in a purely analytical way so that it embraced any , or almost any application of a statutory term and substituted judgment on the meaning of that term , then a prospective applicant would be clear that the courts would intervene using that standard .
9 The courts would decide all questions of law using that word in the sense described above .
10 The approach of the majority seems to have been that even if there was such a breach the courts would refuse to acknowledge that it existed .
11 Whether the courts would extend this remedy to information in documents which were accidentally released as opposed to surrepticiously obtained was answered in English and American Insurance Co Ltd v Herbert Smith [ 1988 ] FSR 232 .
12 It is true of course that the device could potentially backfire : having equipped this Tribunal with so much power , it might begin to use it and impose demands on the executive which exceed those which the courts would demand .
13 In our example the courts would classify the condition of the house , " furnished , " as a jurisdictional fact .
14 However , the justification for excluding such background policy issues from the jurisdiction of the courts would appear to rest on two grounds , both of which may be open to question in the light of the foregoing analysis .
15 Libel damages call for a metaphysical evaluation of dignity , a compensation , in many cases , for loss of amour propre which may be higher than the courts would award for the loss of an arm or a leg .
16 It is possible , though very unlikely , that the courts would grant a further exception to the rule in Foss v.
17 An ambiguously worded provision , patently lacking adequate means of enforcement , may be too slender a ground on which to anticipate that the courts would sanction a derogation from the ownership rights of the shareholders , lying as they do at the foundation of the legal model of the company .
18 You are such a bad man bringing women home for me to cook for that the courts would acquit me . ’
19 The traditional position was that the courts would control the existence and extent of prerogative power , but not the manner of exercise thereof .
20 A fundamental breach is one which the courts would consider more serious than an ordinary breach .
21 Until the seventeenth century the courts would declare Acts of Parliament void if they considered them contrary to natural law , repugnant to the law or impossible to be performed .
22 It may be that the courts would apply some sort of reasonable annual percentage .
23 On this view the courts would determine what adjudicative procedures are required in particular areas .
24 Notwithstanding that the transfer is not lodged for registration or registration is refused , the beneficial interest in the shares will , it seems , pass from the seller to the buyer at the latest at stage ( 2 ) and , indeed will do so at stage ( 1 ) if the agreement is one which the courts would order to be specifically enforced .
25 It is unlikely that the courts would criticise a practitioner who had acted in good faith and in the interests of his patients . ’
26 Their doubts arose from the inability to predict or control how the courts would use the power .
27 Dicta in Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd [ 1980 ] AC 827 suggested that the courts would adopt a generally non-interventionist approach to exclusions in commercial contracts .
28 It is not clear whether the courts would take the same attitude in relation to a general disclosure in a discretionary customer agreement of the fact that the firm might sometimes act as principal .
29 Legal advice from learned leading counsel on both sides was contradictory , and at one stage the Attorney-General advised the Minister of Transport that if the GLC should adopt a certain budgetary policy he thought the courts would accept it .
30 However , it is not known whether the courts would accept this argument , because it can perhaps be said that the shares management acquire in Newco are acquired pursuant to ( though not causally connected to ) an opportunity offered to management ( namely to buy Target or its business ) by reason of their employment/directorships with the vendor or Target .
  Next page