Example sentences of "v. [noun sg] of [noun] [prep] the " in BNC.
Next page| No | Sentence |
|---|---|
| 1 | They started from the position , in my judgment incorrectly , that the references in Thomas v. University of Bradford to the visitor 's jurisdiction being exclusive meant simply that the court did not have concurrent jurisdiction with him . |
| 2 | Sidaway v. Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital and the Maudsley Hospital [ 1985 ] A.C. 871 ; [ 1985 ] 2 W.L.R. 480 ; [ 1985 ] 1 All E.R. |
| 3 | Sidaway v. Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital and the Maudsley Hospital [ 1984 ] Q.B . |
| 4 | It exists notwithstanding that the reasons for making the choice are rational , irrational , unknown or even non-existent : see Sidaway v. Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital and the Maudsley Hospital [ 1985 ] A.C. 871 , 904–905 . |
| 5 | A decision to refuse medical treatment by a patient capable of making the decision does not have to be sensible , rational or well-considered : see Sidaway v. Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital and the Maudsley Hospital [ 1985 ] A.C. 871 , 904–905 . |
| 6 | Gold Star Publications Ltd. v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [ 1981 ] 1 W.L.R. 732 ; [ 1981 ] 2 All E.R. |
| 7 | Hehir v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [ 1982 ] 1 W.L.R. 715 ; [ 1982 ] 2 All E.R. |
| 8 | Makanjuola v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [ 1992 ] 3 All E.R. |
| 9 | Peach v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [ 1986 ] Q.B . |
| 10 | 736 and , despite a number of subsequent expressions of judicial regret and reservation ( see particularly Hehir v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [ 1982 ] 1 W.L.R. 715 and Peach v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [ 1986 ] Q.B . |
| 11 | 736 and , despite a number of subsequent expressions of judicial regret and reservation ( see particularly Hehir v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [ 1982 ] 1 W.L.R. 715 and Peach v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [ 1986 ] Q.B . |
| 12 | The most recent authority in point is the decision of the Court of Appeal in Makanjuola v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [ 1992 ] 3 All E.R. |
| 13 | 736 and so firmly reiterated in Makanjuola v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis is by invoking the decision of the Court of Appeal in Peach v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [ 1986 ] Q.B . |
| 14 | 736 and so firmly reiterated in Makanjuola v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis is by invoking the decision of the Court of Appeal in Peach v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [ 1986 ] Q.B . |
| 15 | 736 was distinguished on the basis that the dominant purpose of the section 49 inquiry in Peach v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [ 1986 ] Q.B . |
| 16 | Second that , as in Peach v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [ 1986 ] Q.B . |
| 17 | We furthermore accept Mr. Richards 's submission that the gravity of the misconduct under investigation can not be the determinative factor as to whether public interest immunity attaches to the documents — Makanjuola v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [ 1992 ] 3 All E.R. |
| 18 | It follows that in our judgment C.N.L. can not successfully bring themselves within the ratio of Peach v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [ 1986 ] Q.B . |
| 19 | Rather , as was pointed out in Makanjuola v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis , it is intended to reassure informants that their statements will only be used for the investigation of complaints and for such criminal or disciplinary proceedings as directly follow . |
| 20 | Someone who has only agreed to buy ( i.e. to whom property has not yet passed ) can not do so , Shaw v. Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis ( 1987 C.A. ) . |
| 21 | In R. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , ex parte Northumbria Police Authority , the police authority sought judicial review to compel the Home Secretary to withdraw a circular issuing plastic bullets and CS gas to local police forces . |
| 22 | On the other hand , in R. v. Secretary of State for the Environment , ex parte Rose Theatre Trust Co. the judge appears to have been of the view that an applicant could have standing only on the basis of a personal interest and not on the basis of representing the interests of others . |
| 23 | However R. v. Secretary of State for the Environment , ex p . |
| 24 | The Court of Appeal stressed in R. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , ex parte Northumbria Police Authority ( C.A. , 1988 ) that the Chief Constable has complete operational control over his force and that the police authority has no power to intervene . |
| 25 | This was also the basis of the court 's intervention in R. v. Secretary of State for the Environment , ex p . |
| 26 | A restricted right to a hearing was upheld by the Court of Appeal in R. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , ex p . |
| 27 | However , if a farmer decides to let out , in return for money , some of the rooms in the farmhouse to friends , relatives and associates during the summer months , this may not be a material change of use and planning permission is not required : Blackpool Borough Council v. Secretary of State for the Environment 11980 ] 40 P & CR 104 ( QBD ) . |
| 28 | In Emma Hotels v. Secretary of State for the Environment [ 1980 ] 258 EG 64 ( QBD ) , it was held in identical circumstances that the operation of a non-residents ' bar was not a material change of use and did not require planning permission . |
| 29 | ( No. 2 ) [ 1990 ] 1 A.C. 109 , 283–284 , H.L. ( E. ) and Lord Ackner in Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Brind [ 1991 ] 1 A.C. 696 , 761 , H.L. ( E. ) applied . |
| 30 | Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Brind [ 1991 ] 1 A.C. 696 ; [ 1991 ] 2 W.L.R. 588 ; [ 1991 ] 1 All E.R. |