Example sentences of "of the court [prep] [noun] in " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 On Feb. 7 , 1990 , Bush nominated Clarence Thomas , 41 , a black conservative lawyer , as judge of the Court of Appeals in Washington .
2 The answer to this question stems from the position of the Court of Appeal in the hierarchy of the courts ; it has an intermediate position .
3 Until recently the role of the Court of Appeal in structuring the discretion of Crown Court sentencers was further constrained by the fact that only the defendant could appeal against sentence .
4 The Attorney-General referred a point of law for the opinion of the Court of Appeal in the following terms :
5 He also criticised the decision of the Court of Appeal in the South Hetton Coal Co. case [ 1894 ] 1 Q.B. 133 , by which we are bound , and with which in any event I agree .
6 Mr. Howell relied on the decision of the Court of Appeal in Reg. v. Shadow Education Committee of Greenwich London Borough Council , Ex parte Governors of John Ball Primary School ( 1989 ) 88 L.G.R. 589 .
7 If authority is needed for that proposition , it can be found in the decision of the Court of Appeal in Rhodes v. Dawson ( 1886 ) 16 Q.B.D. 548 .
8 He relied on the decision of the Court of Appeal in De Falco v. Crawley Borough Council [ 1980 ] Q.B .
9 In circumstances which must be explained at a later stage the appeal is before the Board both by leave of the Court of Appeal in Hong Kong and by special leave granted by the Board itself .
10 Finally , there was the decision of the Court of Appeal in the present case , where the point was considered in great detail in the judgment of Silke V.-P. , by reference to a full range of reported cases ( only a few of which have been cited herein ) , and also to the details of the procedures for judicial review in Hong Kong .
11 Their Lordships have no doubt that the approach of the Court of Appeal in the present case was right .
12 However , the subsequent decision of the Court of Appeal in Brocklebank Ltd. v. The King [ 1925 ] 1 K.B .
13 The Attorney-General referred a point of law for the opinion of the Court of Appeal in the following terms :
14 The first case in the former group — landlord and tenant cases — is the decision of the Court of Appeal in Baynton v. Morgan ( 1888 ) 22 Q.B.D. 74 .
15 Finally , I come to what is probably the most important case of all , the decision of the Court of Appeal in In re E.W.A. ( A Debtor ) [ 1901 ] 2 K.B .
16 I have been helpfully referred to a number of authorities relating to costs , beginning with the decision of the Court of Appeal in Scherer v. Counting Instruments Ltd .
17 The concession was inevitable , having regard to the decision of the Court of Appeal in Reg. v. Panel on Take-overs and Mergers , Ex parte Datafin Plc.
18 That was the approach of the Court of Appeal in Reg. v. Birmingham City Council , Ex parte Ferrero Ltd. ( 1991 ) 89 L.G.R. 977 where the judgments were handed down on 23 May 1991 .
19 Mr. Beloff concedes that the decision of the Court of Appeal in Reg. v. Panel on Take-overs and Mergers , Ex parte Datafin Plc.
20 That was the approach of the Court of Appeal in Reg. v. Birmingham City Council , Ex parte Ferrero Ltd. ( 1991 ) 89 L.G.R. 977 where the judgments were handed down on 23 May 1991 .
21 I agree with the reasoning of the Court of Appeal in Ontario in their decision in Malette v. Shulman ( 1990 ) 67 D.L.R. ( 4th ) 321 , ( a blood transfusion given to an unconscious card-carrying Jehovah Witness ) .
22 In this connection he relied in particular on the statement of principle by Lord Lane C.J. , delivering the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Reg. v. Galbraith [ 1981 ] 1 W.L.R. 1039 , 1042 , where he said :
23 In support of this submission , Mr. Nicholls relied on the decision of the Court of Appeal in Reg. v. Donat ( 1985 ) 82 Cr.App.R. 173 , in which the Court of Appeal held that , on the facts of that case , in which a prosecution witness under cross-examination retracted evidence which he had given in chief implicating the defendant , the judge did not err in declining to withdraw the case from the jury on a submission of no case to answer , the credibility of the witness being essentially a matter for the jury .
24 The most recent authority in point is the decision of the Court of Appeal in Makanjuola v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [ 1992 ] 3 All E.R.
25 736 and so firmly reiterated in Makanjuola v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis is by invoking the decision of the Court of Appeal in Peach v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [ 1986 ] Q.B .
26 The principles on which the court should exercise this discretion have been considered in two recent decisions , one of the Court of Appeal in In re A Debtor ( No. 1 of 1987 ) [ 1989 ] 1 W.L.R. 271 and the other of Hoffmann J. in In re A Debtor ( No. 490–SD–1991 ) [ 1992 ] 1 W.L.R. 507 .
27 274 , a decision of the Court of Appeal in a case where a policy holder was insured against ‘ loss or damage caused by theft . ’
28 This line of reasoning ( though not the approach of the Court of Appeal in Lawrence ) supports a conviction for theft under section 1(1) on any view of the law and enables your Lordships to regard the statements at p. 632 as obiter dicta .
29 This attitude of the courts was strengthened by the decision of the Court of Appeal in Torquay Hotel v. Cousins .
30 Softly be it stated , but that is the reason for the difference between the decision of the Court of Appeal in Anisminic … and the House of Lords .
  Next page