Example sentences of "it [be] hold that " in BNC.

  Previous page   Next page
No Sentence
31 It was commonly held that the first lord to whom he had sworn fealty had the first call on his service ; but in some cases it was held that the richest fief gave the vassal his strongest obligation ; or again , that it depended on the circumstances , on which lord had the greatest need — a lord must be helped if he was fighting in self-defence , but his claim was less if he was fighting in someone else 's defence ; or the vassal might be expected to fight on both sides , that is to say , to provide troops for both armies .
32 In this case the person concerned was a pacifist , and pacifism as a philosophy fell within the ambit of freedom of thought and conscience protected by Article 9 , but it was held that the protester was not manifesting her belief in the sense of Article 9 ( Report of the Commission of 12 October 1978 , Application No. 7050/75 ) .
33 In MacTaggart v B&G Strump 10 TC 17 , decided before s 89 was enacted , it was held that such a payment was a capital payment .
34 This duly happened , and in the judgment published in November 1991 , it was held that the valuation of the estates should take into account the agricultural tenancies granted by the late Lady Fox to herself and her farming partners .
35 In particular , it was held that the law will imply a duty of care when a party seeking information from a party possessed of a special skill trusts that party to exercise due care , and that party knew or ought to have known that reliance was being placed on their skill and judgment .
36 Indeed , the House of Lords expressly approved the earlier judgment in Al Saudi Banque and Others v Clark Pixley ( 1989 ) 3 All ER 361 in which it was held that auditors did not owe a duty of care to a number of banks because it could not be established that the auditors knew either that the company 's accounts were to be shown to the banks or that the banks would rely on them in reaching decisions as lenders .
37 It is a Court of Appeal decision in which it was held that the use of the words ‘ mother ’ and ‘ care ’ in the title of a book Mother Care/Other Care published by Penguin Books — a serious sociological study of problems faced by working mothers who delegated the care of their children to others — was not a trade mark infringement nor a passing off , and Mothercare UK Ltd were not entitled to an injunction restraining Penguin from publishing , advertising or selling the book .
38 On appeal by the company , it was held that the duty of fidelity owed by Fowler and others to the company as former employees was not as great as that owed by an employee during the course of his employment .
39 It was held that an implied term of Mr Hill 's employment contract required his employer to obey the law and insure the lorry .
40 It was held that when making a standard hire-purchase agreement , the hirer merely hired goods and did not obtain credit from the finance company .
41 In Green v Burnett [ 1954 ] 3 All ER 273 it was held that an employer was guilty of ‘ using ’ , as a vehicle with defective brakes was being used on his business .
42 In the case of R v Spurge [ 1961 ] 2 All ER 688 it was held that it was at least careless driving where the driver took a vehicle on a road , knowing there was a defect such as defective steering or brakes .
43 It was held that when the first vehicle parked it was not done so ‘ as to cause ’ an unnecessary obstruction .
44 But in Harding v Price [ 1948 ] 1 All ER 283 it was held that if the driver did not know he had been involved in an accident the section did not apply .
45 In Keen v Parker [ 1976 ] RTR 213 it was held that a sidecar designed for the carriage of goods was just as much a sidecar as one which carried passengers .
46 In Reeve v Webb ( 1972 ) 1 1 7 Sol Jo 1 27 it was held that alterations to exhaust pipes fall within another part of this regulation .
47 In Stoneley v Richardson [ 1973 ] RTR 229 it was held that defective brakes do not have to be proved by an authorised examiner .
48 In the case of Stoneley v Richardson [ 1973 ] Crim LR 310 it was held that it does not matter whether or not the constable who inspected the tyre was an authorised examiner under section 67 Road Traffic Act 1988 .
49 It was held that the refusal was unreasonable because the employers had agreed to pay the extra travelling costs .
50 It was held that his refusal to accept the offer of alternative employment was reasonable ( Charlwood v.
51 It was held that her refusal was reasonable .
52 Manual workers made up a large proportion of the TUC membership , and the health of many of these was depicted as having been destroyed by their employment ; and , moreover , it was held that all workers had a right to a period of leisure in later life supported by-a full subsistence pension .
53 On top of these matters of fact , it was held that ‘ where appropriate , a substantial body of socio-clinical opinion ’ supported substituting community-based services for institutional care .
54 Such private bodies ( some of which are sometimes called ‘ domestic tribunals ’ ) may derive their powers from a contract : in one case , for example , it was held that a trade union had to comply with the ( public law ) rules of natural justice in deciding whether the dismiss a union official .
55 A turning-point came in the case of Ridge v. Baldwin in which it was held that the distinction between administrative and judicial functions was of no relevance to deciding whether a decision-maker ought to comply with the rules of natural justice or to the availability of judicial review remedies .
56 For example , in Malone v. Metropolitan Police Commissioner it was held that since there was no law against telephone tapping and it did not amount to any common law wrong , it was not unlawful for the police to engage in it .
57 For example , in one case it was held that electrical contractors , as such , had no right to complain that a local authority had not followed proper tendering procedures in letting out a contract for the installation of central heating .
58 It was held that the applicants lacked a sufficient interest in the matter because the Revenue had acted within the discretion permitted to it in the day-to-day administration of the tax system .
59 In that case it was held that a journalist lacked standing for an order ( of mandamus ) that the chair of the justices should reveal the names of the magistrates who had heard a particular case , but that he did have standing for a declaration that a policy of not disclosing the names of justices who heard certain types of cases was contrary to the public interest and unlawful .
60 But in the Felixstowe Justices case it was held that the applicant journalist was entitled to represent the public interest as a ‘ private Attorney-General ’ .
  Previous page   Next page