Example sentences of "reg. [prep] [noun sg] of [noun sg] [prep] " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 ( No. 2 ) [ 1990 ] 1 A.C. 109 , 283–284 , H.L. ( E. ) and Lord Ackner in Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Brind [ 1991 ] 1 A.C. 696 , 761 , H.L. ( E. ) applied .
2 Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Brind [ 1991 ] 1 A.C. 696 ; [ 1991 ] 2 W.L.R. 588 ; [ 1991 ] 1 All E.R.
3 Nevertheless it may be resorted to in order to help resolve some uncertainty or ambiguity in municipal law : per Lord Ackner in Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Brind [ 1991 ] 1 A.C. 696 , 761 .
4 Article 10 , as with any other provision of the Convention , is not a rule of the law of this country : see Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Brind [ 1991 ] 1 A.C. 696 .
5 If , on the other hand , it is not clear by established principles of our law that the council has the right to sue in libel for alleged injury to its reputation , so that this court must decide whether under the common law that right is properly available to the council as a local government authority , then , as is not in dispute , this court must , in so deciding , have regard to the principles stated in the Convention and in particular to article 10 : see Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Brind [ 1991 ] 1 A.C. 696 .
6 See also Lord Bridge of Harwich and Lord Ackner in Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Brind [ 1991 ] 1 A.C. 671 , 747 , 760 .
7 Reg. v. Secretary of State for Transport , Ex parte Factortame Ltd .
8 In support of this submission , he relied in particular on the approach of the European Court of Justice in Reg. v. Secretary of State for Transport , Ex parte Factortame Ltd .
9 On the ground that the dispute entailed an assessment of the interpretation of the provisions and principles of Community law , in particular of the principle of non-discrimination on grounds of nationality , the right of establishment and the principle of proportionality , the Divisional Court of the Queen 's Bench Division ( Reg. v. Secretary of State for Transport , Ex parte Factortame Ltd. [ 1989 ] 2 C.M.L.R. 353 ) decided , by an order of 10 March 1989 pursuant to article 177 of the E.E.C .
10 Mr. Advocate General Mischo delivered the following opinion in Reg. v. Secretary of State for Transport , Ex parte Factortame Ltd .
11 Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Brind [ 1991 ] 1 A.C. 696 ; [ 1991 ] 2 W.L.R. 588 ; [ 1991 ] 1 All E.R.
12 Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Brind [ 1991 ] 1 A.C. 696 ; [ 1991 ] 2 W.L.R. 588 ; [ 1991 ] 1 All E.R.
13 Reg. v. Secretary of State for Transport , Ex parte Pegasus Holdings ( London ) Ltd. [ 1988 ] 1 W.L.R. 990 ; [ 1989 ] 2 All E.R.
14 Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Handscomb ( 1987 ) 86 Cr.App.R. 59 , D.C. disapproved in part .
15 Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Benson ( No. 2 ) , 9 November 1988 ; The Times , 21 November 1988 , D.C.
16 Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Handscomb ( 1987 ) 86 Cr.App.R.59 , D.C.
17 Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Oladehinde [ 1991 ] 1 A.C. 254 ; [ 1990 ] 2 W.L.R. 1195 ; [ 1990 ] 2 All E.R.
18 Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Walsh , 16 December 1991 ; The Times , 18 December 1991 , D.C.
19 Reg. v. Secretary of State for Trade and Industry , Ex parte Lonrho Plc. [ 1989 ] 1 W.L.R. 525 ; [ 1989 ] 2 All E.R.
20 Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Environment , Ex parte Nottinghamshire County Council [ 1986 ] A.C. 240 ; [ 1986 ] 2 W.L.R. 1 ; [ 1986 ] 1 All E.R.
21 Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Brind [ 1991 ] 1 A.C. 696 ; [ 1991 ] 2 W.L.R. 588 ; [ 1991 ] 1 All E.R.
22 Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte G. , The Times , 26 June 1990 ; Court of Appeal ( Civil Division ) Transcript No. 555 of 1990 , C.A.
23 Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Gunnell ( unreported ) , 30 October 1984 ; Court of Appeal ( Civil Division ) Transcript No. 391 of 1984 , C.A.
24 On 2 March 1987 the Divisional Court gave its decision in Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Handscomb ( 1987 ) 86 Cr.App.R. 59 .
25 In Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Handscomb , 86 Cr.App.R. 59 , 75 , Watkins L.J .
26 The argument is supported by reference to the decision of the Divisional Court in Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Handscomb , 86 Cr.App.R. 59 .
27 In a later decision of the Divisional Court , in Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Benson ( No. 2 ) , The Times , 21 November 1988 , Lloyd L.J .
28 in Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Benson ( No. 2 ) , The Times , 21 November 1988 .
29 in Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex parte Benson ( No. 2 ) , The Times , 21 November 1988 , the duty is to consult , not to obey .
30 Thus in Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department , Ex part Handscomb , 86 Cr.App.R. 59 , 79 , Watkins L.J .
  Next page