Example sentences of "v. [noun sg] [noun sg] of [noun] " in BNC.
Next page| No | Sentence |
|---|---|
| 1 | Even disciplinary decisions taken by the prison governor could be reviewable ( see Leech v. Deputy Governor of Parkhurst ( N. L. , 1988 ) ) . |
| 2 | Leech v. Deputy Governor of Parkhurst Prison [ 1988 ] A.C. 533 ; [ 1988 ] 2 W.L.R. 290 ; [ 1988 ] 1 All E.R. |
| 3 | Reg. v. Deputy Governor of Parkhurst Prison , Ex parte Hague [ 1992 ] 1 A.C. 58 ; [ 1991 ] 3 W.L.R. 340 ; [ 1991 ] 3 All E.R. |
| 4 | 425 was quoted with approval by Lord Bridge of Harwich in Leech v. Deputy Governor of Parkhurst Prison [ 1988 ] A.C. 533 , 554 . |
| 5 | Leech v. Deputy Governor of Parkhurst Prison [ 1988 ] A.C. 533 ; [ 1988 ] 2 W.L.R. 290 ; [ 1988 ] 1 All E.R. |
| 6 | Jago v. District Court of New South Wales ( 1989 ) 168 C.L.R. 23 ; 87 A.L.R. 577 |
| 7 | We respectfully adopt the reasoning of Brennan J. in Jago v. District Court of New South Wales ( 1989 ) 168 C.L.R. 23 . |
| 8 | Jago v. District Court of New South Wales ( 1989 ) 168 C.L.R. 23 |
| 9 | 3 ) , similar to one which had been advanced before the High Court of Australia in Jago v. District Court of New South Wales ( 1989 ) 168 C.L.R. 23 . |
| 10 | We respectfully adopt the reasoning of Brennan J. in Jago v. District Court of New South Wales ( 1989 ) 168 C.L.R. 23 . |
| 11 | Thorpe v. Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police [ 1989 ] 1 W.L.R. 665 ; [ 1989 ] 2 All E.R. |
| 12 | In R. v. Chief Constable of Devon and Cornwall ex p . |
| 13 | Unfortunately , later observations of the Civil Division of the Court of Appeal in R. v. Chief Constable of Devon and Cornwall , ex p . |
| 14 | In practice processions appear to have a favoured place providing there is no actual obstruction , that they are peaceful and that police directions are observed ( see Hirst v. Chief Constable of West Yorks ( C.A. , 1986 ) ) . |
| 15 | Ltd [ 1985 ] AC 210 ; Yuen Kun-yeu v. AG of Hong Kong [ 1987 ] 2 All ER 705 ; Hill v. Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [ 1989 ] AC 53 ; Caparo Industries v. Dickman [ 1990 ] 1 All ER 568 . |
| 16 | Gur Corporation v. Trust Bank of Africa Ltd. [ 1987 ] Q.B . |
| 17 | Where Her Majesty 's Government is dealing with the foreign government on a normal government to government basis as the government of the relevant foreign state , it is unlikely in the extreme that the inference that the foreign government is the government of that state will be capable of being rebutted and questions of public policy and considerations of the interrelationship of the judicial and executive arms of government may be paramount : see The Arantzazu Mendi [ 1939 ] A.C. 256 , 264 and Gur Corporation v. Trust Bank of Africa Ltd. [ 1987 ] Q.B . |
| 18 | Gur Corporation v. Trust Bank of Africa Ltd. was concerned with a question of the recognition of a state and the competence of a subordinate body within the recognised territory of that state under the laws of that state . |