Example sentences of "of [art] plaintiff 's [noun pl] " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 In all the circumstances I consider that the proper course is not to find if there 's any windfall element of the plaintiff 's parents and therefore to ignore such arguments .
2 The pragmatic approach of the courts to the question of when publication brings the obligation to an end is shown in Speed Seal Ltd v Paddington [ 1985 ] 1 WLR 1327 where the publication of the plaintiff 's secrets had been made by the defendant .
3 Abuse of possession which the defendant already has may take many forms , such as sale accompanied by delivery of the plaintiff 's goods or their documents of title to another , pawning them , or otherwise disposing of them .
4 Where the defendant is in possession of the plaintiff 's goods there is no doubt that an unjustified refusal to return them generally constitutes conversion but it has been held that where the plaintiff has possession there is no conversion if the defendant simply refuses to allow the plaintiff to remove them .
5 Where the defendant is no longer in possession of the plaintiff 's goods because , for example , he has destroyed them or disposed of them , the plaintiff 's remedy is judgment for the value of the goods together with any consequential loss which is not too remote .
6 All three of the plaintiff 's friends were killed in the accident and the plaintiff sustained very grave injuries which kept her in hospitals and a rehabilitation centre for almost three years .
7 At the outset , the plaintiff may be slow to contact a solicitor , negotiations for a settlement may drag on , the extent of the plaintiff 's injuries may not become clear until the end of a lengthy period of treatment , investigations may have to be carried out to ascertain the evidence , expert opinions may have to be obtained , communication and action by both sides may be poor and slow , the advice of counsel may be taken , pleadings are often extended , the length of time spent waiting for the trial to begin can be substantial , and errors may be made by the professionals involved .
8 The making of the assessment of damages in the light of all facts known at the date of the trial enables the court to take into account , if it be the case , the fact that the consequences of the plaintiff 's injuries were more serious than at first thought ; the fact that the expenses to which the plaintiff would be put in consequence of his injuries were higher than was first thought ; the fact that the plaintiff has died ; or the fact that the plaintiff has , since the accident , volunteered to be made redundant .
9 Looking at the terms of the agreement as contained in the letter from Hunter 's attorney , and the receipt , it is manifest that the payment was not made in discharge of the plaintiff 's rights against all other parties ; and the result of the whole is , that it does not operate as a release , or matter which could have been pleaded as an accord and satisfaction , but amounts merely to an engagement not to sue Hunter , which can only be pleaded by himself ; if the action , therefore , had been brought against two parties , it would not have been a discharge to both .
10 Or , it may be considered as a release to one , qualified by a reservation of the plaintiff 's rights against the other , as in Solly v. Forbes ( 1820 ) 2 Br. & B. 38 .
11 Thus it may be committed by wrongfully taking possession of goods , by wrongfully disposing of them , by wrongfully destroying them or simply by wrongfully refusing to give them up when demanded , for in all these cases can be traced conduct by the defendant which amounts to a denial of the plaintiff 's rights or the assertion of inconsistent rights .
12 Another apparent exception to the general rule that ignorance of the plaintiff 's rights does not excuse was recognised by the Privy Council in Maynegrain Pty .
13 The nature of the plaintiff 's claims , and the questions in issue , will have been identified .
14 January 21 , 1972 Mr Sugden applied to the court for leave to withdraw his admission of agency with consent of the plaintiff 's solicitors .
15 They were aware of the plaintiff 's difficulties and that the price was too low .
16 The defendant made similar controllers and used a total of 49 of the plaintiff 's mnemonics arguing that there was no copyright in them because , once the functions had been decided , there was no room for skill and labour in devising the mnemonics .
17 On 2 October 1990 the inspector requested accounts of and details of transactions with one of the plaintiff 's subsidiaries , B ( Pte ) Ltd ( a Singapore company ) , as it was possible that this information would lead to the amendment of existing assessments .
18 ( The concessions related to the defendant 's entitlement to make use of any recollection they might have of the names and addresses of the plaintiff 's customers as well as the most convenient routes by which the premises of such customers could be reached .
19 There was a muted concession made regarding the requirements of the plaintiff 's customers and the times when deliveries were made to them. ) ( 2 ) The information about the prices was not clearly severable from the rest of the sales information .
20 To summarize the total award is thus made up in this way there are agreed items as shown on the er schedule of the plaintiff 's submissions which come to three hundred and fifty two thousand , five hundred and ninety six pounds ,
21 Either the plaintiff will receive £8,251 + costs ( if the judge 's estimate tallies with that of the plaintiff 's advisers ) or a much lower figure ( if it does not , and he or she has to pay costs ) .
22 They can also be very useful in the most serious cases to describe in sympathetic detail the daily course of the plaintiff 's symptoms and treatment .
23 Mr Alastair Brett , for the journalist and Times Newspapers Limited , said : ‘ The defendants , having made extensive inquiries into the allegation , are quite satisfied that Mr Bouvier was not the father of the plaintiff 's twins and very much regret that the allegation was ever published .
24 The gifts of which evidence was given were in favour of the plaintiff 's children and in the circumstances did not in substance conflict … with his intention to benefit the plaintiff .
25 The merits of the plaintiff 's objections to the means of valuation do not appear from the report , and did not need to , because this was a striking-out application under RSC Ord 18 , r19 , which allows no evidence to be heard about the case that the plaintiff wished to make .
26 After joining the plaintiff as an assistant solicitor the defendant entered an agreement with T , one of the plaintiff 's clients .
27 The use of substantial bank guarantees in support of the plaintiff 's undertakings would not necessarily be either practicable or , certainly where a foreign State was plaintiff , appropriate .
28 One of the effects of a very severe head injury is that bone fractures heal extremely quickly and this caused problems in the management of the plaintiff 's fractures .
  Next page