Example sentences of "was hold that the " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 In both these cases it was held that the alternative of a manslaughter verdict ought to be left to the jury where the occasion justifies action in self-defence , or to prevent a crime , or to apprehend an offender , but where the defendant acts beyond the necessity of that occasion .
2 In N.C.B. v Thorne it was held that the word ‘ nuisance ’ in s.92(1) ( a ) of the Public Health Act 1936 must mean either a public or private nuisance as understood at common law .
3 It was held that the words , ‘ like proceedings shall be had ’ , should be construed to give any person aggrieved the right to apply by way of information and summons for the penal orders available under s.94 of the 1936 Act .
4 It was commonly held that the first lord to whom he had sworn fealty had the first call on his service ; but in some cases it was held that the richest fief gave the vassal his strongest obligation ; or again , that it depended on the circumstances , on which lord had the greatest need — a lord must be helped if he was fighting in self-defence , but his claim was less if he was fighting in someone else 's defence ; or the vassal might be expected to fight on both sides , that is to say , to provide troops for both armies .
5 In this case the person concerned was a pacifist , and pacifism as a philosophy fell within the ambit of freedom of thought and conscience protected by Article 9 , but it was held that the protester was not manifesting her belief in the sense of Article 9 ( Report of the Commission of 12 October 1978 , Application No. 7050/75 ) .
6 This duly happened , and in the judgment published in November 1991 , it was held that the valuation of the estates should take into account the agricultural tenancies granted by the late Lady Fox to herself and her farming partners .
7 In particular , it was held that the law will imply a duty of care when a party seeking information from a party possessed of a special skill trusts that party to exercise due care , and that party knew or ought to have known that reliance was being placed on their skill and judgment .
8 It is a Court of Appeal decision in which it was held that the use of the words ‘ mother ’ and ‘ care ’ in the title of a book Mother Care/Other Care published by Penguin Books — a serious sociological study of problems faced by working mothers who delegated the care of their children to others — was not a trade mark infringement nor a passing off , and Mothercare UK Ltd were not entitled to an injunction restraining Penguin from publishing , advertising or selling the book .
9 On appeal by the company , it was held that the duty of fidelity owed by Fowler and others to the company as former employees was not as great as that owed by an employee during the course of his employment .
10 It was held that the refusal was unreasonable because the employers had agreed to pay the extra travelling costs .
11 A turning-point came in the case of Ridge v. Baldwin in which it was held that the distinction between administrative and judicial functions was of no relevance to deciding whether a decision-maker ought to comply with the rules of natural justice or to the availability of judicial review remedies .
12 It was held that the applicants lacked a sufficient interest in the matter because the Revenue had acted within the discretion permitted to it in the day-to-day administration of the tax system .
13 But in the Felixstowe Justices case it was held that the applicant journalist was entitled to represent the public interest as a ‘ private Attorney-General ’ .
14 Everett ( H.C. , 1989 ) it was held that the court had jurisdiction to review a decision to refuse to issue a passport even although this involved the exercise of a prerogative power .
15 It was not however accepted by the Court of Appeal in Peter Andrew Russell where it was held that the conversion of the salt ( cocaine hydrochloride ) into the base form amounted to production .
16 On appeal against that ruling , it was held that the judge was correct in the view that he took .
17 Reliance was placed on Director of Public Prosecutions v. Ellis [ 1973 ] 1 W.L.R. 722 , where it was held that the fact that two accused persons had been prosecuted to conviction did not mean that the purposes of Part I of the Act , namely securing compliance with and detecting evasion of the Act , were spent ; and that accordingly it was still open to the authorities to employ their powers to obtain information relative to the same transaction from another person .
18 In that case , it was held that the sub-tenant of part of a house was not ‘ residing with ’ her mother in the whole house just because her sub-tenancy entitled her to share the kitchen with her mother .
19 Jones ( Note ) [ 1957 ] 1 W.L.R. 1118 , also cited by Kerr L.J. , a granddaughter was allowed to occupy one room in the house of her grandmother and it was held that the granddaughter was entitled to succeed to the tenancy of the whole house .
20 On appeal to the House of Lords it was held that the objection was well-founded .
21 The landlord gave six months ' notice and it was held that the notice was good .
22 In Morgan v. Palmer ( 1824 ) 2 B. & C. 729 it was held that the plaintiff was entitled to recover from the Mayor of Great Yarmouth a sum which he had been required to pay as a condition of being granted a renewal of his publican 's licence , the payment having been demanded without lawful authority .
23 It was held that the sheriff was not entitled to retain the surplus .
24 It was held that the payment was not voluntary so as to preclude recovery .
25 In an action to recover these fees it was held that the registrar of the cemetery had no right to demand fees for recutting and repainting but that there being no suggestion that any unpleasant result would follow from non-payment the plaintiff must be taken to have paid voluntarily .
26 It was held that the liability of the original lessee was not extinguished by the partial surrender .
27 It was held that the other members of the committee were not discharged .
28 On appeal to the Crown Court it was held that the defendant had no case to answer on the ground , put shortly , that the constable had not independently decided whether to require blood or urine but had simply followed the Metropolitan Police pro forma instruction then current .
29 Accordingly it was held that the breath specimen had been inadmissible in evidence .
30 170 it was held that the word ‘ convicted ’ in sections 9 and 12 of the Coinage Offences Act 1861 ( 24 & 25 Vict. c. 99 ) referred to no more than a finding of guilt .
  Next page