Example sentences of "with [conj] [noun] [prep] " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 Are any of your colleagues that you play er squash with or tennis with er in the same boat in terms of self employment
2 Interference with or removal of the latter will inevitably lead to changes in the reservoirs of nutrients and their inter-reservoir fluxes .
3 5.2.1 all rates taxes assessments duties charges impositions and outgoings which are now or during the Term shall be charged assessed or imposed upon the Premises or upon the owner or occupier of them [ excluding any payable by the Landlord occasioned by receipt of the rents or by any disposition of dealing with or ownership of any interest reversionary to the interest created by this Lease ] [ and if the Landlord shall suffer any loss of rating relief which may be applicable to empty premises after the end of the Term by reason of such relief being allowed to the Tenant in respect of any period before the end of the Term to make good such loss to the Landlord ] and
4 But a payment made under pressing necessity to avoid a seizure of goods , or to obtain the release of goods unlawfully detained , or to prevent some interference with or withholding of a legal right , is compelled and not voluntary and is recoverable in an action for money had and received .
5 if the other party shall commit any act of bankruptcy , shall have a receiving order made against it , shall make or negotiate for any composition or arrangement with or assignment for the benefit of its creditors or , if the other party being a body corporate shall present a petition or have a petition presented by a creditor for its winding up or shall enter into any liquidation ( other than for the purpose of reconstruction or amalgamation ) , shall call any meeting of its creditors , shall have a receiver of all or any to its undertakings or assets appointed , shall be deemed to be unable to pay its debts , or shall cease to carry on business
6 ‘ When theft is alleged and that which is alleged to be stolen passes to the defendant with the consent of the owner , but that has been obtained by a false representation , has ( a ) an appropriation within the meaning of section 1(1) of the Theft Act 1968 taken place , or ( b ) must such a passing of property necessarily involve an element of adverse inference with or usurpation of some right of the owner ?
7 ‘ When theft is alleged and that which is alleged to be stolen passes to the defendant with the consent of the owner , but that has been obtained by a false representation , has ( a ) an appropriation within the meaning of section 1(1) of the Theft Act 1968 taken place , or ( b ) must such a passing of property necessarily involve an element of adverse inference with or usurpation of some right of the owner ?
8 In the context of section 3(1) , the concept of appropriation in my view involves not an act expressly or impliedly authorised by the owner but an act by way of adverse interference with or usurpation of those rights .
9 ‘ If , as I understand all your Lordships to agree , the concept of appropriation in section 3(1) involves an element of adverse interference with or usurpation of some right of the owner , it is necessary next to consider whether that requirement is satisfied in either of these cases .
10 In cases such as the present , it is in truth a combination of these actions , the removal from the shelf and the switching of the labels , which evidences adverse interference with or usurpation of the right of the owner .
11 It is the doing of one or more acts which individually or collectively amount to such adverse interference with or usurpation of the owner 's rights which constitute appropriation under section 3(1) and I do not think it matters where there is more than one such act in which order the successive acts take place , or whether there is any interval of time between them .
12 If anyone else does so , he does an act , as Lord Roskill puts it , by way of adverse interference with or usurpation of that right .
13 ‘ involves not an act expressly or impliedly authorised by the owner but an act by way of adverse interference with or usurpation of those rights .
14 ‘ involves not an act expressly or impliedly authorised by the owner but an act by way of adverse interference with or usurpation of those rights .
15 ‘ Moreover , on general principles , it would in my judgment be a plain interference with or usurpation of an owner 's rights by the customer if he were to remove a label which the owner had placed on goods or put another label on .
16 ‘ In the context of section 3(1) , the concept of appropriation in my view involves not an act expressly or impliedly authorised by the owner but an act by way of adverse interference with or usurpation of those rights .
17 ‘ When theft is alleged and that which is alleged to be stolen passes to the defendant with the consent of the owner , but that consent has been obtained by a false representation , has , ( a ) an appropriation within the meaning of section 1(1) of the Theft Act 1968 taken place , or , ( b ) must such a passing of property necessarily involve an element of adverse interference with or usurpation of some right of the owner ?
18 I would respectfully agree with his description , in relation to dishonest actions , of appropriation as involving an act by way of adverse interference with or usurpation of the owner 's rights , but I believe that the less aggressive definition of appropriation which I have put forward fits the word as used in an honest sense in section 2(1) as well as elsewhere in the Act .
19 ‘ In Reg. v. Morris [ 1984 ] A.C. 320 the House of Lords held that ‘ In the context of section 3(1) , the concept of appropriation … involves not an act expressly or impliedly authorised by the owner but an act by way of adverse interference with or usurpation of [ the owner 's ] rights . ’
20 The Supreme Court of Victoria by a majority quashed the conviction on appeal , holding that , under the Crimes Act 1958 ( which in its amended form corresponded closely with the Act of 1968 ) , the necessary element of appropriation required proof of adverse interference with or usurpation of some right or rights of the owner ( Reg. v. Morris ) .
21 The views expressed ( obiter ) by this House in Reg. v. Morris [ 1984 ] A.C. 320 that ‘ appropriation ’ involves an act by way of adverse interference with or usurpation of the rights of the owner treats the word appropriation as being tantamount to ‘ misappropriation . ’
22 The concept of adverse interference with or usurpation of rights introduces into the word appropriation the mental state of both the owner and the accused .
23 Lord Roskill said that the law was this : " [ i ] t is the doing of one or more acts which individually or collectively amount to … adverse interference with or usurpation of the owner 's rights which constitute appropriation under s.3(1) . "
24 ( b ) Applying Morris , was there an adverse interference with or usurpation of the owner 's rights ?
25 In Morris the Lords held that there was no appropriation without an adverse interference with or usurpation of the owner 's rights .
26 In the exercise of his power of arrest , it was perfectly proper for the constable to have taken into account that ‘ there was a greater likelihood … that Mrs Mohammed-Holgate would respond truthfully to questions about her connection with or knowledge of the burglary , if she were questioned under arrest at the police station , than if , without arresting her , questions were put to her … at her own home from which she could peremptorily order [ him ] to depart at any moment ’ .
27 If Coleman accepted the assignment , under no circumstances would he permit anybody to have any direct contact with or knowledge of DIA operatives in the region or allow anyone to suspect that he was reporting ‘ back channel ’ to Donleavy in Washington .
28 It is because these principles have been lost that much modern architecture is criticized : there is no link with or respect for Nature .
29 One 's social position as an autonomous , equal adult is ascribed : Buid youths do not have to achieve equality with or autonomy from adult men through acts of violence , as among so many headhunting societies in Southeast Asia .
30 In the opinion of the deputy judge the operation of that Part , concerned as it was with giving the authorities powers to secure compliance with or detection of evasion of the Act , came to an end when they had secured sufficient evidence to justify a charge .
  Next page