Example sentences of "[pers pn] [be] held that he " in BNC.
Next page| No | Sentence |
|---|---|
| 1 | Rigge v. Bell ( 1793 ) 5 Durn. & E. 471 a parol agreement for a seven-year lease did not comply with the Statute of Frauds 1677 but the tenant entered and paid a yearly rent and it was held that he was tenant from year to year on the terms of the agreement . |
| 2 | In an action against the original lessee for the balance of the outstanding rent , it was held that he was not absolved as a consequence of the order made in the suit against the assignee . |
| 3 | Owing to the provisions of the Trade Disputes Act 1906 C could not rely upon a simple conspiracy to injure but in the House of Lords it was held that he was entitled to succeed on the ground of intimidation . |
| 4 | Where a purchase of licensed premises was made subject to the purchaser obtaining a transfer of the certificate , and the purchaser undertook to do all in his power to obtain a transfer , and the transfer was refused by the licensing court , and the purchaser refused to appeal or to concur in an appeal against the refusal , it was held that he had failed to do all in his power to obtain a transfer , and was found liable in damages to the seller : Skinner v. Breslin ( 1905 ) 13 S.L.T. 91 ; cf. |
| 5 | It was held that he was entitled to do this . |
| 6 | It was held that he was not entitled to claim his travelling expenses from the advertiser . |
| 7 | In Chelmsford Auctions v. Poole it was held that he also had the right personally to sue the purchaser for the price . |
| 8 | It was held that he committed an offence under section 14 . |
| 9 | It was held that he could not , since by accepting the seller 's offer on the telephone he had accepted the goods and thereby affirmed the contract . |
| 10 | It was held that he was entitled to the return of the price , on the ground that he had suffered a ‘ total failure of consideration . ’ |
| 11 | It was held that he was treating the property as his own to dispose of regardless of the shop 's rights contrary to s.6(1) . |
| 12 | It was held that he had an intention permanently to deprive because he intended to sell them irrespective of the Revenue 's rights , despite the fact that the vouchers would come back to the Revenue . |
| 13 | It was held that he was properly indicted with stealing from the company because a person or company in control of the site is deemed prima facie to have control over things on the land . |
| 14 | It was held that he was not guilty of theft because there was no such special arrangement as would give rise to the obligation in s.5(3) . |
| 15 | It was held that he was not a trustee of the money for the brewers and therefore he was under no obligation to deal with it in a certain way . |
| 16 | It was held that he had not used it within s.12(1) . |
| 17 | It was held that he had impliedly represented that he had no reason to disbelieve the clock . |
| 18 | It was held that he was not guilty . |