Example sentences of "must [vb infin] that [noun] [prep] " in BNC.
Next page| No | Sentence |
|---|---|
| 1 | We must recognise that villages in the past were nucleations of farms and cottages , generally in a discrete unit of land , with a separate field system , managed communally so that all farmers and landholders were interdependent on each other . |
| 2 | The child should sit near the blackboard and the teacher must remember that vision across the room may be lowered and the child unable to see demonstration or materials presented . |
| 3 | In particular we must conclude that SEDIMENTATION IN THE PAST HAS OFTEN BEEN VERY RAPID INDEED AND VERY SPASMODIC . |
| 4 | The historian must recognize that diversity of fortune existed within towns as well as between them . |
| 5 | Given this , we must recognize that knowledge of appearances is not , in itself , such a worthless thing ; what we know on the basis of sense-experience is perfectly good for many purposes . |
| 6 | But even if this were true , it would only alter the degree of the problem , as the rocks on the west coast of Scotland are almost entirely hard and the cutting of beaches in narrow straits must indicate that waves of considerable power have operated there . |
| 7 | This must mean that cross-examination about these reasons is irrelevant . |
| 8 | From the very start , one must realise that WordStar for Windows 1.5 is meant to be more than just a word-processor , but is perhaps more aptly billed as a document processor . |
| 9 | Yet we must admit that reminiscences of natural forms can not be absolutely banished , at least not yet . |
| 10 | It is extremely important that the client must learn that avoidance of difficult situations is never an appropriate solution for their anxiety . |
| 11 | Thus , according to Russell , since the possibility of a recurrence of the same " complexes of compresence " can not be excluded ( there is no equivalent of Leibniz 's principle of sufficient reason to ensure their numerical uniqueness ) we must accept that propositions about order in time , such as " If A precedes B , B does not precede A " , " If A is before B and B is before C , then A is before C " , etc. are merely empirical propositions and not inviolable a priori truths . |