Example sentences of "or shall do " in BNC.
Next page| No | Sentence |
|---|---|
| 1 | All such grants of authority may be expressed in the following manner : if X exists the tribunal may or shall do Y. X may consist of a number of different elements , factual , legal and discretionary . |
| 2 | On the one hand , in a certain sense , all the elements which comprise X condition the tribunal 's power to decide upon Y. The statute says , explicitly or implicitly , if X you may or shall do Y. On the other hand , to accept that the reviewing courts should be the ultimate arbiters of the meaning of all the elements comprising the X factor would cause review to become very like appeal . |
| 3 | It is very common for a statute to say if X 1 , X 2 , X 3 exist the tribunal may or shall do Y. X 2 and X 3 would , like X 1 , be shorthand descriptions presuming the existence of elements within the bracket . |
| 4 | The enabling statute always , explicitly or implicitly , states , if X 1 , X 2 , X 3 exist you may or shall do Y. Yet , if X 1 , X 2 , and X 3 , and all the elements constituting them , were always held to be jurisdictional in a legal sense , the dividing line between review and appeal would be emasculated : the tribunal would have power to give only the right answer , this meaning the answer which accords with the view of the reviewing court . |
| 5 | All statutes giving power in effect say if X exists , you may or shall do Y. The answer as to who is to determine X ( and the factors constituting X ) is dependent upon which theory of jurisdiction is accepted . |
| 6 | To revert to our earlier terminology : given that all tribunals are delegated power in the form of if X 1 , X 2 , X 3 , you may or shall do Y , everything relating to X becomes potentially jurisdictional . |
| 7 | At the inception of the previous chapter it was said that all grants of power to public bodies could be broken down into two parts : if X exists , you may or shall do Y. |