Example sentences of "court [vb mod] have " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 I suspect Sir George Bailey at Seal Court may have something but he 's not willing to let anyone look .
2 Nor was there any dispute that in certain circumstances the High Court may have a supervisory jurisdiction over decisions of the judges of the High Court ( see In re Smalley [ 1985 ] A.C. 622 , 641–642 ) , or indeed Law Lords : see the Page case [ 1991 ] 1 W.L.R. 1277 , 1284 .
3 After such period of adjustment as the Court may have allowed , the Record is closed and within fourteen days thereafter , each party is required to provide his opponent with ‘ a list of documents which are or have been in his possession or control relating to the matters in dispute in the action ’ .
4 In 841 – 2 , the prominent position of Adalard 's brother Gerald at Lothar 's court may have eased the route to a settlement between Charles and Lothar .
5 The court may have to balance the risk against the benefits in deciding whether the decision to market the product was justified .
6 Supplementary statements may be filed without leave subject to any direction the court may have made as to timing ( FPCR , r17(2) ; FPR , r4.17(2) ) .
7 If care proceedings arise from a s37 investigation ( see Chapter 3 , 1(b) ) it should be remembered that the court may have already made a first interim order when making the direction .
8 The court may have ordered one party 's solicitor to conduct the conveyancing ; but if not so , it would seem appropriate ( assuming the husband to be the conveyancing or transferring party ) for the husband 's solicitors , if the house is in the sole name or even if it is in the joint names of the husband and wife , to deliver to the wife 's solicitors an epitome of title consisting of a copy of the last conveyance , copy of any mortgage , copies of any documents relating to " sales-off " or other transactions affecting the property and copies of any covenants affecting the same .
9 Evidence at the coroner 's court should have given him little confidence in the outcome , but events took an upward turn when Marion Lindo stepped into the witness box .
10 Goulding J. made it clear that he was not expressing , on an ex parte application , any decided view of the jurisdictional issue , though he accepted that where orders in personam were concerned it was enough that the court should have the party who must obey its order within its power .
11 The court should have regard to the gravity of the offences under consideration and the offender 's criminal history .
12 If , however , it is not clear in what terms the relevant law is to be formulated , and there is no binding authority upon the matter , this court should have regard to the terms of the Convention because it is a safe presumption that the law of contempt of court in this country is in conformity with the requirements of that Convention .
13 It seems to me equally , if not more , inappropriate that the court should have devoted six hours to the investigation of the application for the full order including oral evidence .
14 The only head of public interest upon which the inspectors rely is the prevention of crime , and so the question to be answered is whether on the material before it the court should have been satisfied that disclosure of Mr. Warner 's sources is ‘ necessary … for the prevention of … crime ’ within the meaning of section 10 .
15 We believe that that is right , but the court should have a discretion , particularly where no fault lies with the defendant .
16 The court should have read written statements of the evidence and any expert reports before the hearing ( FPCR , r21(1) ; FPR , r4.21(1) ) .
17 In deciding the scope of a " fair comment " plea and the degree of interpretative sophistication to bring to bear on the question of whether a passage is " comment " or " fact " , the court should have regard to the constitutional importance of the " fair comment " defence as a protection for freedom of expression .
18 If a conventionalist thinks that the Court should have disregarded Plessy in Brown because racial segregation is especially immoral , he will insist that the Court should have made plain to the public the exceptional nature of its decision , that it should have admitted it was changing the law for nonlegal reasons .
19 If a conventionalist thinks that the Court should have disregarded Plessy in Brown because racial segregation is especially immoral , he will insist that the Court should have made plain to the public the exceptional nature of its decision , that it should have admitted it was changing the law for nonlegal reasons .
20 Magistrates sitting in the Juvenile Court must have completed the special training for the Juvenile Panel .
21 Highbury Corner Stipendiary Magistrate ex p. di Matteo established that before making an order depriving an offender of his rights in property under Powers of Criminal Courts Act 1973 , s.43 , the court must have some evidence of the value of the property concerned ( also in that case a car ) so that it can fulfil the obligation imposed by section 43(1A) to have regard to the value of the property concerned .
22 He held that , even on an application for leave , the court must have regard to the child 's welfare as the paramount consideration .
23 In other words , in the circumstances of the present case the wishes and feelings of W. , considered in the light of her age and understanding , are the first of the factors to which the court must have regard , but the court must have regard also to such of the other factors as may be relevant when discharging its overall responsibility for W. 's welfare .
24 In other words , in the circumstances of the present case the wishes and feelings of W. , considered in the light of her age and understanding , are the first of the factors to which the court must have regard , but the court must have regard also to such of the other factors as may be relevant when discharging its overall responsibility for W. 's welfare .
25 ( 5 ) Wherever , in ( 3 ) and ( 4 ) above , the order requires one or other court to consider whether it ought to try the case or whether it ought to transfer it ( pursuant to the powers of transfer under ss 40(2) , 41(1) or 42(2) of the 1984 Act ) that court must have regard to the criteria laid down in art 7(5) and set out at the start of Chapter 13 .
26 When considering transfer the court must have regard to the general principle in s1(2) that any delay in determining matters is likely to prejudice the welfare of the child .
27 Note that a county court may transfer proceedings back to the magistrates ' court at any time before trial if the criteria for transfer are not met or no longer apply but the court must have regard to the child 's interests and the need to avoid delay ( APO , art 11 ) .
28 When deciding whether to grant a request for transfer , the court must have regard to the general principle in s1(2) that delay is likely to be prejudicial to the child 's welfare and should apply the criteria for transfer in APO , art 7 ( see ( b ) above ) .
29 As always , the court must have regard to the need to avoid delay .
30 As always , the court must have regard to the need to avoid delay when considering transfer .
  Next page