Example sentences of "[conj] you [be] not a " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 So , on the whole , although you 're not a physicist , clearly by your remarks you think that technology and progress in that sense is a good thing , rather than a bad thing .
2 ‘ You can depict wine , love , women and glory on the condition that you 're not a drunkard , a lover , a husband or a private in the ranks .
3 Much of the psychological pain caused by infertility of either partner comes from the idea that you are not a real man or a real woman if , for any reason , some small part of your reproductive system works inadequately .
4 You do not know that you are not a brain , suspended in a vat full of liquid in a laboratory , and wired to a computer which is feeding you your current experiences under the control of some ingenious technician/scientist ( benevolent or malevolent according to taste ) .
5 Is it possible , however , that though you do not know that you are not a brain in a vat you still know many other things , perhaps more important ?
6 We can surely conclude that if you know that you are sitting reading , you know that you are not a brain in a vat , and hence ( by simple modus tollens ) that since you do n't know that you are not a brain in a vat ( agreed above ) you do n't know that you are sitting reading .
7 We can surely conclude that if you know that you are sitting reading , you know that you are not a brain in a vat , and hence ( by simple modus tollens ) that since you do n't know that you are not a brain in a vat ( agreed above ) you do n't know that you are sitting reading .
8 It seems therefore to show , more generally , that since you do n't know that you are not a brain in a vat you can not know any proposition p of which you know that if p were true , you would not be a brain in a vat .
9 All we need is to show that your belief that you are not a brain in a vat can not be justified since nothing in your experience can count as evidence for that proposition , and then appeal to an analogue of : which holds that if a is justified in believing that p and that p implies q , a is justified in believing that q .
10 Perhaps , however , we can make this claim by appeal to the initial moves of the argument that you are not justified in believing that you are not a brain in a vat .
11 There we claimed that if nothing in your experience could count as evidence that you were not a brain in a vat , your belief that you are not a brain in a vat can not be called justified .
12 The conditional theory of knowledge can show that you do not know that you are not a brain in a vat .
13 For a necessary condition for such knowledge , 3 ( that if it were not true that you are not a brain in a vat , you would not believe that you are not a brain in a vat ) fails .
14 For a necessary condition for such knowledge , 3 ( that if it were not true that you are not a brain in a vat , you would not believe that you are not a brain in a vat ) fails .
15 We can simplify this conditional as follows : if you were a brain in a vat , you would not believe that you are not a brain in a vat .
16 This is false because if you were a brain in a vat ( being fed your current experiences ) , you would still believe that you are not a brain in a vat .
17 Therefore , if the conditional theory of knowledge is on the right lines , you do not know that you are not a brain in a vat .
18 First , it can reinforce our intuitions that you know that you are sitting reading etc. , that you know that if you are sitting reading etc. you are not a brain in a vat , and that you do not know that you are not a brain in a vat .
19 However , you do not know that you are not a brain in a vat because it is not the case that ( 3 ) in the nearest worlds in which you are a brain in a vat you believe that you are a brain in a vat .
20 I take it too that you are not a habitué of Boston . ’
21 ‘ It is a pity that you are not a Medjay yourself .
22 If so , all I would say is that you are not a child now .
23 In fact its grip is restricted entirely to those propositions whose truth would mean that you were not a brain in a vat .
24 There we claimed that if nothing in your experience could count as evidence that you were not a brain in a vat , your belief that you are not a brain in a vat can not be called justified .
25 ‘ I had observed that you were not a damned Englisher .
26 ‘ But ye should n't be standing here , if ye 're not a whore , if ye do n't hiv a stickman — it 's dangerous . ’
27 But you are not alone and you are not a failure .
28 Sometimes you make a mistake , and you are not a Bisu at all , but simply what they " — he gestured resignedly at the howling spectators — " call us all anyway , just " lady boys " ! "
29 Even a policeman would n't dare poke about without a search warrant — and you 're not a policeman .
30 " I want to please you and you 're not a bit as I expected you to be . "
  Next page