Example sentences of "[prep] [conj] [pron] had [noun sg] " in BNC.
Next page| No | Sentence |
|---|---|
| 1 | What makes these system knowledge-based is not that it somehow takes knowledge to write them , nor that they behave as if they had knowledge , but rather that their architectures include explicit knowledge bases . |
| 2 | Then the inner office , even more discreetly sumptuous , and two more smooth bitches , secretaries this time , both looking as if they had starch in their well-bred pants . |
| 3 | Some men were like that , as if they had X-ray eyes . |
| 4 | No other manufacturer would be so profligate in their use of fabric but the Ashleys behaved as if they had fabric to spare . |
| 5 | His skin was rather yellow as if he had bile problems or a stone in his kidneys . |
| 6 | This was another characteristic that he had : he often talked about himself as if he had custody of someone who needed a lot of upbringing . |
| 7 | as if he had X-ray eyes he could visualise the metal cylinder concealed within the bag , the pointed bomb with its tail fins reclining at an angle of forty-five degrees . |
| 8 | He began to paint feverishly , as if he had time to make up . |
| 9 | And so warm , if felt as if it had substance . |
| 10 | The letter was waiting , lying in her pocket in a demanding way as if it had control of her . |
| 11 | He was n't sure who I was talking about and I had difficulty myself in recognising this creature of so many years before . |
| 12 | What sort of person would you want to be met with if you had business to do with the company ? |
| 13 | It depends how much you got into whether you had asthma or not . |
| 14 | Held , ( 1 ) allowing the cross-appeals ( Lord Mustill and Lord Slynn of Hadley dissenting ) , that , where a visitor 's decision was made within his jurisdiction in that he had power under the relevant regulating documents to enter into the adjudication of the dispute in question , his decision was not amenable to challenge by judicial review on the ground of error in fact or law contained in that decision ; and that , accordingly , the Divisional Court had had no jurisdiction to entertain the applicant 's motion for judicial review ( post , pp. 1114F–G , G–H , 1121G–H , 1124H — 1125B , H ) . |