Example sentences of "[conj] [adv] if [letter] " in BNC.
Next page| No | Sentence |
|---|---|
| 1 | If A has been disturbed in his possession by a trespass committed by B , or even if B has deprived A of possession , A's claim to legal protection or redress against B can not be met by B's plea that C and not A is the true owner . |
| 2 | Such statements are in fact usually false , either because the combination of a and b is not a necessary condition of p , so that even if X had not done b , p might still have occurred , or because , even if X had n't done b , some other agent would have done it instead , thereby bringing about p . |
| 3 | The belief is not in part what is certainly different , that even if x occurred , if f had not occurred , s would not have — or that even if x had occurred , if s occurred , so did f . |
| 4 | The belief is not in part what is certainly different , that even if x occurred , if f had not occurred , s would not have — or that even if x had occurred , if s occurred , so did f . |
| 5 | The first criterion can be satisfied , of course , without its also being true that even if x ( any other event or condition or set of them ) had also occurred , then if we had not got cc we would not have got e . |
| 6 | If we know unc and unc we say " A if and only if B " , an assertion we write briefly as unc or A iff B. Technically all definitions should be in " iff " form . |
| 7 | Bar-Hillel [ 1967 ] argues for the superiority of meaning postulates over semantic markers due to their ability to represent arguments of lexical items , which are essential for expressing the relation between the meanings of words like ’ buy ’ and ’ sell ’ : for any x , y , z ( x sells y to z if and only if z buys y from x ) |
| 8 | a ) The b , x-normal form programs unc and unc are equivalent if and only if n = n " and there is a bijection unc such that , for each e , unc and unc is equivalent ( as an ALT pattern ) |