Example sentences of "[noun sg] [vb past] [vb pp] when [pron] have " in BNC.
Next page| No | Sentence |
|---|---|
| 1 | Where last the light had died when she had gone . |
| 2 | Without any warning , she found herself remembering how Julius 's body had felt when she had cannoned into it , just minutes ago . |
| 3 | The poor woman had died when she had been bombed in the blitz . |
| 4 | And what the hell had happened when he 'd first met Rohmer ? |
| 5 | She remembered how the temperature in the restaurant had dropped when she had made her unwitting gaffe . |
| 6 | It was n't right the way her heart had leapt when he 'd touched her . |
| 7 | She had thought she was just physically attracted to him , but the way her heart had leapt when he 'd returned just now was something else . |
| 8 | Time was , he remembered , when she had attended the Greek Orthodox Church , where he also had gone when small , but its splendour had palled when she had realized that more fashionable people belonged to the United Church . |
| 9 | Jean-Paul thought of what their mother had said when he had his farewell interview with his brother . |
| 10 | Just as her mother had done when she 'd arrived in Athens so many years before . |
| 11 | ‘ But why must you go away , just when Corrie 's leaving me ? ’ her mother had asked when she 'd told her she had fixed up a job as a nanny with a family in the north which would give her a better chance of training as nursery nurse . |
| 12 | The local authority appealed against the orders and sought an interim care order on the grounds that ( 1 ) the justices had erred in law when they had made the order preventing the parents from having contact with each other as contact between adults was not a step which could be taken by a parent in meeting his responsibilities towards his child and thus fell outside the terms of section 8(1) of the Children Act 1989 ; ( 2 ) there had been no application for a section 8 order and before exercising powers under section 10(1) ( b ) of the Act of 1989 the justices should have invited the parties to make representations , and the failure to do so was a material irregularity ; ( 3 ) the justices , having found as a fact that the parents had been in continuous contact and there were grounds for believing that the children would suffer harm , had been plainly wrong in refusing to make the interim care order in respect of both children in that they had failed to have regard to the facts that both parents had colluded over injuries to D. , the mother had lied when she had stated that there had been no contact with the father , the father had been in breach of a bail order there had been a violent incident on 23 November 1991 which had involved both parents , the mother had refused to be accommodated with the children in a mother and baby home , and the mother had changed her mind about the adoption of R. ; and ( 4 ) in all the circumstances the order which would have been in the best interests of the children and which the justices should have made was an interim care order . |