Example sentences of "[prep] or usurpation [prep] [det] " in BNC.
Next page| No | Sentence |
|---|---|
| 1 | If anyone else does so , he does an act , as Lord Roskill puts it , by way of adverse interference with or usurpation of that right . |
| 2 | In the context of section 3(1) , the concept of appropriation in my view involves not an act expressly or impliedly authorised by the owner but an act by way of adverse interference with or usurpation of those rights . |
| 3 | ‘ involves not an act expressly or impliedly authorised by the owner but an act by way of adverse interference with or usurpation of those rights . |
| 4 | ‘ involves not an act expressly or impliedly authorised by the owner but an act by way of adverse interference with or usurpation of those rights . |
| 5 | ‘ In the context of section 3(1) , the concept of appropriation in my view involves not an act expressly or impliedly authorised by the owner but an act by way of adverse interference with or usurpation of those rights . |
| 6 | ‘ When theft is alleged and that which is alleged to be stolen passes to the defendant with the consent of the owner , but that has been obtained by a false representation , has ( a ) an appropriation within the meaning of section 1(1) of the Theft Act 1968 taken place , or ( b ) must such a passing of property necessarily involve an element of adverse inference with or usurpation of some right of the owner ? |
| 7 | ‘ When theft is alleged and that which is alleged to be stolen passes to the defendant with the consent of the owner , but that has been obtained by a false representation , has ( a ) an appropriation within the meaning of section 1(1) of the Theft Act 1968 taken place , or ( b ) must such a passing of property necessarily involve an element of adverse inference with or usurpation of some right of the owner ? |
| 8 | ‘ If , as I understand all your Lordships to agree , the concept of appropriation in section 3(1) involves an element of adverse interference with or usurpation of some right of the owner , it is necessary next to consider whether that requirement is satisfied in either of these cases . |
| 9 | ‘ When theft is alleged and that which is alleged to be stolen passes to the defendant with the consent of the owner , but that consent has been obtained by a false representation , has , ( a ) an appropriation within the meaning of section 1(1) of the Theft Act 1968 taken place , or , ( b ) must such a passing of property necessarily involve an element of adverse interference with or usurpation of some right of the owner ? |
| 10 | The Supreme Court of Victoria by a majority quashed the conviction on appeal , holding that , under the Crimes Act 1958 ( which in its amended form corresponded closely with the Act of 1968 ) , the necessary element of appropriation required proof of adverse interference with or usurpation of some right or rights of the owner ( Reg. v. Morris ) . |