Example sentences of "court of [noun] in [noun] [prep] " in BNC.

  Next page
No Sentence
1 In 1840 the House of Lords accepted the proposition that bills for discovery , the procedure in the Courts of Equity in aid of actions at law , could not be maintained except by and against parties to the record at law .
2 The next significant decision is the decision of Fraser J. at first instance in the High Court of Ontario in Duval v. Seguin ( 1972 ) 26 D.L.R. ( 3d ) 418 .
3 ‘ Yes , it 's already with the Court of Probate in Chancery at Westminster Hall .
4 These questions were considered by the Supreme Court of Victoria in Watt v. Rama [ 1972 ] V.R. 353 , whose conclusions and reasoning were adopted by Potts J. in B. v. Islington Health Authority [ 1991 ] 1 Q.B .
5 So held the Court of Session in IRC v Stenhouse 's Trustees [ 1992 ] STI 120 , quashing a ruling by the Special Commissioners .
6 The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Palau in Gibbons v Salii has affirmed that there is no authority to enter into the Compact of Free Association without compliance with the Constitution .
7 Their Lordships were shown a judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada in Stinchcombe v. The Queen ( unreported ) , 7 November 1991 from which it appears that ( partly in reliance on section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ) a much wider view is taken of the prosecution 's duty of disclosure of documents to the defence , namely , that , subject to certain discretions as to whether and when disclosure should be made , the Crown has a legal duty to disclose all relevant information to the defence on the basis that
8 A similar tendency to expand the concept of compulsion is to be discovered in the majority judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada in Eadie v. Township of Brantford ( 1967 ) 63 D.L.R. ( 2d ) 561 ( though events of a more dramatic character have since occurred in that jurisdiction , to which I will refer in a moment ) .
9 The students ' case is due to be heard at the European Court of Justice in Luxemburg on Wednesday , March 6 , 1991 .
10 These were two of the points made in the opinion delivered at the end of April by the Advocate General to the European Court of Justice in relation to four test cases to clarify an earlier ECJ watershed case on equal pension rights , Barber v Guardian Royal Exchange , which found on 17 May 1990 that Article 119 of the Treaty of Rome on equal pay applied to pension benefits .
11 However , since the decision of the European Court of Justice in Francovich v. Republic of Italy ( Case C 6/90 and C 9/90 ) [ 1992 ] I.R.L.R. 84 ( judgment delivered on 1 November 1991 ) , there must now be doubt whether the Bourgoin case was correctly decided .
12 In support of this submission , he relied in particular on the approach of the European Court of Justice in Reg. v. Secretary of State for Transport , Ex parte Factortame Ltd .
13 The Pennsylvania law had been considered by the 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia in October 1991 .
14 Similarly with regard to misrepresentations made , it was held in Overbrooke Estates Ltd v Glencombe Properties Ltd [ 1974 ] 1 WLR 1335 ( followed by the Court of Appeal in Collins v Howell-Jones ( 1980 ) 259 EG 331 ) , that a clause limiting the authority of auctioneers and the firm 's employees to make or give representations or warranties , fell outside the scope of the original version of s3 of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 , since it was a limitation on the apparent authority of the auctioneers rather than an exemption clause .
15 570 an order deciding a preliminary issue of documentary construction was held to be a final order for the purposes of an appeal under the Supreme Court Act 1981 which does not allow an appeal to the Court of Appeal in England without leave from an interlocutory order .
16 This case was approved by the Court of Appeal in Congreve v. Home Office .
17 The Court of Appeal in Parker v. British Airways Board took the opportunity to restate the law in a comprehensive manner and bring order to an area in which there were numerous conflicting precedents .
18 This was made clear by the Court of Appeal in Rapier v London Tramways Co . ,
19 Lord Denning 's view of the law of qualified privilege was rejected by the Court of Appeal in Blackshaw v Lord .
20 The recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Eurocopy v Teesdale and others ( 1992 ) BCLC 1067 supports the argument that it is a defence whereas Goff v Gauthier P & Ch [ 1991 ] 388 supports the contrary view .
21 The " red hand " test was reaffirmed by the Court of Appeal in Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [ 1971 ] 2 QB 163 .
22 Finally , Pace takes the Court of Appeal in Tan to task for ignoring developments elsewhere .
23 The common law rule on this was laid down by the Court of Appeal in Cresswell v. Sirl but this rule has been replaced , so far as the protection of livestock against dogs is concerned , by section 9 of the Animals Act .
24 However , as was pointed out by the Court of Appeal in Coward v Comex Houlder Diving Ltd ( 1988 ) ( reported in Kemp & Kemp , Section M , para27-322 ) the conventional percentage does not necessarily apply where the wife had been earning a considerable sum herself prior to her husband 's death or presumably where she had a substantial private income : see also Davies v Hawes ( 1990 ) reported in Kemp & Kemp , Section M , para27-323 .
25 This extreme case of judicial interference with the powers of public authorities may be contrasted with the attitude of the Court of Appeal in Secretary of State for Employment v. ASLEF and Others ( No. 2 ) .
26 Under the old law , the Court of Appeal in Secretary of State for Employment v Spence [ 1987 ] QB 179 gave a strict literal interpretation to reg 5 of the Transfer Regulations .
27 The catalyst was a judgment by the French Court of Appeal in favour of Paul Touvier , the first Frenchman to be charged with crimes against humanity , for his actions as head of information of the Lyon branch of the ‘ Milice ’ .
28 The Court of Appeal in Jones v Sherwood ( cited at 13.6.1 ) also addressed the practical problem of how the alleged mistake could be rectified by the court .
29 I agree with the reasoning of the Court of Appeal in Ontario in their decision in Malette v. Shulman ( 1990 ) 67 D.L.R. ( 4th ) 321 , ( a blood transfusion given to an unconscious card-carrying Jehovah Witness ) .
30 This view calls into doubt the approach taken by the Court of Appeal in Wormell v RHM Agriculture ( East ) Ltd [ 1987 ] 1 WLR 1091 ( see Chapter 5 ) .
  Next page