No | Pattern | Freq | Relations |
---|---|---|---|
1 | [pron] was [vb pp] that the | 1337 | |
2 | [pron] was [vb pp] that the | 1337 | |
3 | [pers pn] was [vb pp] that the | 1335 | |
4 | it was [vb pp] that the | 1275 | |
5 | it was [vb pp] that the | 1275 | |
6 | [pron] was held that the | 160 | |
7 | [pron] was agreed that the | 104 | |
8 | [pron] was reported that the | 66 | |
9 | [pron] was announced that the | 61 | |
10 | [pron] was decided that the | 58 | |
11 | [pron] was found that the | 56 | |
12 | [pron] was suggested that the | 56 | |
13 | [pron] was felt that the | 47 | |
14 | [pron] was argued that the | 43 | |
15 | [pron] was told that the | 42 | |
16 | [pron] was said that the | 35 | |
17 | i was [vb pp] that the | 35 | |
18 | i was [vb pp] that the | 35 | |
19 | [pron] was discovered that the | 31 | |
20 | [pron] was estimated that the | 31 | |
21 | [pron] was assumed that the | 31 | |
22 | [pron] was thought that the | 30 | |
23 | [pron] was hoped that the | 29 | |
24 | [pron] was believed that the | 27 | |
25 | [pron] was revealed that the | 26 | |
26 | [pron] was noted that the | 24 | |
27 | [pron] was expected that the | 21 | |
28 | [pron] was alleged that the | 20 | |
29 | he was [vb pp] that the | 18 | |
30 | he was [vb pp] that the | 18 |