No | Pattern | Freq | Relations |
---|---|---|---|
1 | was also an | 165 | |
2 | was just an | 107 | |
3 | was still an | 79 | |
4 | was quite an | 69 | |
5 | was only an | 56 | |
6 | was always an | 40 | |
7 | was now an | 32 | |
8 | was merely an | 31 | |
9 | was probably an | 31 | |
10 | was simply an | 26 | |
11 | was once an | 25 | |
12 | was certainly an | 25 | |
13 | was clearly an | 24 | |
14 | was already an | 23 | |
15 | was never an | 22 | |
16 | was indeed an | 20 | |
17 | was rather an | 19 | |
18 | was essentially an | 19 | |
19 | was therefore an | 18 | |
20 | was then an | 16 | |
21 | was originally an | 15 | |
22 | was hardly an | 15 | |
23 | was obviously an | 15 | |
24 | was often an | 14 | |
25 | was really an | 12 | |
26 | was primarily an | 12 | |
27 | was even an | 11 | |
28 | was almost an | 11 | |
29 | was thus an | 10 | |
30 | was there an | 9 |