SN4 ""

No	Pattern	Freq
1	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] [prep]	291
2	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] [prep]	291
3	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] [art]	269
4	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] [art]	269
5	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] [pron]	259
6	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] [adv]	242
7	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] the	163
8	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] the	163
9	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] [adj]	139
10	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] [pers pn]	126
11	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] [adv prt]	121
12	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] [noun]	115
13	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] [adv]	114
14	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] a	106
15	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] a	93
16	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] [pos pn]	87
17	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] [conj]	86
18	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] [det]	76
19	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] to	67
20	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] to	67
21	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] it	60
22	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] it	60
23	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] [noun sg]	52
24	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] [verb]	52
25	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] for	42
26	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] for	42
27	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] [adj]	39
28	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] [that]	39
29	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] that	39
30	[pers pn] would have [to-vb] that	39